Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: Applied "regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO
 number" to the regulator tree
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
References: <CGME20181120134333eucas1p27a19912dddf4b9b34da505e0973c9137@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
 <66d3b74c-0152-b17b-89d4-a21d33445b25@samsung.com>
 <20181120144700.GB16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main>
 <f1c7e9fe-aa57-c7c4-1c2f-02105a5a7474@samsung.com>
 <20181120153215.GC16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main>
 <20181120153610.GD16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main>
 <9314db6c-9498-579d-430c-5a2992fe513e@samsung.com>
 <59879030-93a4-f562-b03b-c5e579d44e89@opensource.cirrus.com>
 <772b6fdc-57af-fef2-0c85-78446bec2c2a@samsung.com>
 <ea2b959c-0d04-6a50-4d69-3f03576fdac9@opensource.cirrus.com>
 <20181120170103.GP3894@sirena.org.uk>
From:   Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Message-ID: <5eec838b-e454-9ce4-22b1-7d00ef28ead4@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:10:17 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181120170103.GP3894@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 20/11/18 17:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 04:57:16PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>> On 20/11/18 16:34, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> 
>>> Deferred probe was there already. This patch however introduced the
>>> warning from gpiolib and I would like to have it fixed somehow. In both
> 
>> I don't follow what it is you want, are you asking that it shouldn't probe
>> defer, or that it shouldn't log the reason why it deferred?
> 
> He's complaining that gpiolib and/or the driver's usage of it shouldn't
> be generating a backtrace in normal operation.
> 
Ah, I didn't see that. I seem to have not received the start of this thread and
the subsequent discussion only includes the -517 warnings not a mention of
a backtrace.