Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266150AbUALMLv (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:11:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266156AbUALMLv (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:11:51 -0500 Received: from aun.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.36]:12239 "EHLO aun.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266150AbUALMLt (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:11:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:11:42 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200401121211.i0CCBg5u006677@harpo.it.uu.se> From: Mikael Pettersson To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, raul@pleyades.net Subject: Re: SMP or UP??? Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1309 Lines: 32 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:20:39 +0100, DervishD wrote: > I have an used Gigabyte GA-7ZXE mobo, with chipset VIA KT133A, >wearing a Duron 1000 processor, since December. AFAIK this mobo is >uniprocessor (it has only a socket, that should be a good >evidence...), but when booting I get these messages (I just show >those relevant to the issue): > >kernel: Linux version 2.4.21 (root@DervishD) (gcc version 3.2.2) #1 Wed Jul 2 17:25:21 CEST 2003 >kernel: found SMP MP-table at 000fb210 > > What, SMP table? ... > This is not an issue, because the system seems to work OK, but >for me is very strange and I'm not sure wether this may cause >problems or not... You have an anti-problem. The chipset includes an I/O-APIC (good) and your mobo manufacturer was decent enough to include the appropriate BIOS MP tables to describe it to the OS. Other manufacturers skip the MP table, forcing you to enable ACPI and pray it actually works. This is one area where Gigabyte seems to be consistently better (more user-friendly) than ASUS. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/