Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1213622imu; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:38:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dHwdP0AoNspL0xPvDfGaCwRftjQmWUw/YHzVwoV6vVh0gZ6mt6ZWXL2hruCkqNBnO4Jmrc X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8354:: with SMTP id z20mr3891224pfm.81.1542749920776; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:38:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1542749920; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pfhKRKV+I7ZlZ6Lj6AC+tAtDmlqH+dg91EoIgo38qSttACMZrOurcTZde9Rrh7lq3R o1b0XDi5xKRKkoVYzr1z+ng9d9OFa6tIj0VtcjjC066+cX/GS4MSWBgwTLUq6qraiY0z Kz9QZdEzYN846Z+a0SE5EpSvvOTyhtVsqr9+zq4JcyuO0tG+I/wRYzZsfGA6+WY8uwkE 2xZQaZK6G1Cg3z4wB3/E3MbPE1uyQct5cwpyGnRIa97ImHbvkPvW+GFWDNXsujyqEVHJ FxOJmySxG1KDUXYbb9IS554AfhVCbXLWsvNjiIrmFPWxraqkEI7Pcx2pa588yya0dYHn 4YJQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=U1AbgYUN1jEdc9HbMwKFDtHl4hO7tiaWqmLTv03OEZs=; b=qDxgrC6LoH22GdNWhGmRJre5/9HRoQJt18NcR5BF7yT0xoMS4L9v8VtEoFkDN5pbPT TiABGn01DZPx5EgmpkEAHySykTyzYav4aJCQc6oMjisdlDfBLA7vfopILZPvGCGSMtfG tcMQdQzptLBDrXpzmJ5iIxzye6eV37pu8m39M1MsYInvPBIdngqoI5isjJtKuLJ4AfQe CgdypPrArX3WJYQuGh9rS7QROELwwbFm3bkLemgCQ43GqbUN+lzyrAtg2kcIwn4dK8fG CWfYxsg6U+tXnnuMEngc1vYVJ671k69gv5j3UyvgiA2P+3qDdZcsxCP/ad3BNdW7zmGk Ym0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p9-v6si51571995pfe.76.2018.11.20.13.38.26; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:38:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726434AbeKUHtM (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 02:49:12 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:14749 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725926AbeKUHtM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 02:49:12 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Nov 2018 13:18:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,258,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="92700723" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.126]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2018 13:18:03 -0800 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10A063018C4; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:18:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:18:03 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: Kyle Huey Cc: Kan Liang , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Ingo Molnar , Robert O'Callahan , Alexander Shishkin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Linus Torvalds , Stephane Eranian , Thomas Gleixner , Vince Weaver , acme@kernel.org, open list Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] x86, perf: counter freezing breaks rr Message-ID: <20181120211803.GF13936@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20181120194129.GC13936@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20181120201144.GD13936@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I suppose that's fair that it's better for some use cases. The flip > side is that it's no longer possible to get exactly accurate counts > from user space if you're using the PMI (because any events between > the overflow itself and the transition to the PMI handler are > permanently lost) which is catastrophically bad for us :) Yes that's a fair point. For most usages it doesn't matter. I suspect that's a case for supporting opt-out for freezing per perf event, and rr using that. -Andi