Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     Alessia Mantegazza <amantegazza@vaga.pv.it>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] doc:it_IT: update italian documentation
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:24:40 +0100
Message-ID: <2014691.yjRn1oZ3S9@harkonnen>
In-Reply-To: <20181120091610.35ebffee@lwn.net>
References: <20181108232417.14982-1-federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> <20181120091610.35ebffee@lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:16:10 PM CET Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri,  9 Nov 2018 00:24:14 +0100
> 
> Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> wrote:
> > In this small patch set there is the V3 of
> > "doc:it_IT: add some process/* translations" in which I fixed
> > the recent conflicts in docs-next.
> > I took the occasion to add other two simple patches that fix:
> > - a missing translation in locking.rst
> > - apply a patch from the official documentation to the italian one
> 
> OK, I have applied the set, apologies for taking so long.
> 
> I do have one request: there are an awful lot of entries that simply say
> "ancora da tradurre" in here; those are not going to bring much joy to
> your readers.  
> Can I ask that you try to reduce those in number, either by
> doing the work or concluding that it won't happen and just removing them?

If you refer to the empty documents, the idea is to keep all links working (as 
discussed a while ago). It will not change much if I remove them but I still 
say "see document XYZ"; at the end the document is not there or it says 
"translate me", in both cases the reader is not happy.  So, I would like to 
keep them anyway to simplify the job.

If you are refering to those I added in index files as place holders: yes I 
can remove them.

> No timelines or anything - I'd just be happy to see the work go in that
> direction.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon