Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266179AbUALSzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:55:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266203AbUALSzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:55:50 -0500 Received: from lpbproductions.com ([68.98.208.147]:21202 "HELO lpbproductions.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266179AbUALSzs (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:55:48 -0500 From: "Matt H." To: ross@datscreative.com.au Subject: Re: NForce2, Ross Dickson's timer patch on 2.6.1 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:15:11 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <20040112173554.GA792@tesore.local> In-Reply-To: <20040112173554.GA792@tesore.local> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401121215.11503.lkml@lpbproductions.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2291 Lines: 52 Ditto here, using nforce2. I've been up for about a week and a half and my clock is skew'ed by at least 20 mins . Matt H. On Monday 12 January 2004 10:35 am, Jesse Allen wrote: > Hi Ross, > > I have a version of your timer patch (io_apic.c) for kernel 2.6.1. It is > attached. I have been monitoring a problem with it. It seems that with > the patch, I gain 1 seconds time over 10 minutes (roughly). So I gain > about 2-3 mintues a day. I haven't taken exact measurements, but I know it > ends up about 20 minutes difference after a week. This is not good, which > would require resetting the time often. > > I tried the 2.6.1 kernel without the timer patch. The timer is now back in > PIC mode, and interrupt 7 has the old noise. Synched the time with my > watch. At first, I noticed no gain in time over 10 minutes. However the > next day, I found it gained 1-2 seconds. Now it is about 7 seconds ahead a > few days later now. This is much better. > > So I'm left to thinking, the patch does two things, maybe one thing right, > and one possibly very wrong: > > 1) It does place the timer in APIC mode. > 2) But the timer seems to be fed extra interrupts, maybe the same that is > found on irq 7 without the patch (is this possible?) > > I remember someone making a comment which might explain the issue: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107098440019588&w=2 > > I don't think the patch was much different now than it was then. So I > think there is something wrong with setting up the timer this way. I don't > know if you worked something out with Maciej. I don't know much about > interrupt controller programming so... if maybe you can explain to me > anything I'm missing. For now I've dropped the patch. > > > Jesse > > > PS: I have run with disconnect on, and without your ack patch since I got > that surpise BIOS update. No lockups have occurred in the past month, > since that. So the disconnect problem is a BIOS bug. (Shuttle has not > responded) > > PSS: CC me, I'm not subscribed right now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/