Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3225577imu; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 00:31:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5crScC1eW1RiBBJq/Iv+1xxWZoRaPsAzGf755g5eWsHFqnBgj+oWSJV7IIQ67tLnZQNWbKX X-Received: by 2002:aa7:804e:: with SMTP id y14-v6mr18993825pfm.73.1543048315087; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 00:31:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543048315; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=detB6nkqL2tq773OXlRNvB1hLIZEAticXDJcUmWC91CC240ivbj0ZTqVjVKtdeA3oe 4vxgC7P98EtA0+2dFYuY/wbNbEHnAJctbv0uTLP52bQn1RVF4Fpj9BGSqlvFsLqQRLXk Je2eXMUmYU+d2W5xmey4IFCrUTB6wH+SuWX1TECHW62GYJSRwX818qL91KiUiPzAABPn yiOPxQC9LK0qtdyM+x/rbMaB8IdS8RFWq3N5pf113DzcjpZ5QSIKYqf63NSY8Zim2zdG LSvLvyVEZFmKi7aqij0F/ek5WyB7gvY4fTodVRQ/ZAuh5wzNyC5yKAPa1FtpwjYdbDpf R/hw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=1i5cJD7dtBPIKUJ1vk1tbF/Vq8rFtrmvcUuxYJfDHKo=; b=Q3CkEJXRy/ORUIDzhk0WFDcX5TYKp5Yx7aSMdJ6FxNXtSUV3GBiUp+gJo4/TwpUlr7 YVtusFuJIQokEhSELAI3669MJvDiwD76Pg9yU2wv+K/Ugvf/3IbHmPbyeYAeoPGZZfrP jGLjawHPf7XHWw6ew0p8RftC6DDFSAfWQahPDUbDYyVUATXeTA65yRw9GwkAMyR3U0ll hX0g1oe08lwYtG+yIzu0q/+h1cGCHGh9bP9OhkiphuarjJCQJKf3SAtCyu4cg8RQGQM4 OK1wD6jOy4q2hUvTvXknlL/A8RdtEobSqo0GdLTVNUHvgm1E6m5UGyjZLg6GJ/p4ipOk 6G9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@ffwll.ch header.s=google header.b=WpqmA6fq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y73si53394982pgd.478.2018.11.24.00.31.40; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 00:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@ffwll.ch header.s=google header.b=WpqmA6fq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2504297AbeKWXPE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:15:04 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:46450 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2504288AbeKWXPD (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:15:03 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id o10so10094926edt.13 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 04:31:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1i5cJD7dtBPIKUJ1vk1tbF/Vq8rFtrmvcUuxYJfDHKo=; b=WpqmA6fq9ypZEqgOHA32IioWamFR+pLfw/q8VAbZhYzZj/nb3BeDnn82na90PfBLqT 4gP7Zn0Qr2qLGa/j2Zz2YQut6TRFCIfOU5n1TNKxvJVwzTTltmyREUapXdmiCiLRdN5y av/Ay+uu40MgsBQKAoDCV1u9uEeXJXJgu4cqU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1i5cJD7dtBPIKUJ1vk1tbF/Vq8rFtrmvcUuxYJfDHKo=; b=o8LDV20dUBj6CRy6bDT7Tmc+vZ8QAuADKJp4BXLLrl2WagIJiXshlMCcokRknd3KfY u2PqTGV2OzblVcTV2kBkUGXF03dr2t2U4ZxRfTEvjul5tu++ctC3+zOe/4kAhsQtgzgv 7yxRECwJVLbtg4Lj7wVnrDYyNcmgyTBFDuAmi5KgobsCoO9kyWtAS9x+0+NIgYFpj3qf 3pNuhrndLO3RB8ihg0sA4cDIr5HJQ9SRgWWbulS/CHbQcByu98V9Ff8cjlIKO0DcvxWR l3iEiWOYVscUvSmb+qpvDkrRcI+w4mMk2dMtbPFdblCfzcIRxUAGtdqOGacBgABxcxJz B85g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gK7sba2P9Pd6CU+HV40hBRmP5SVRh1eJuWR2W4yhJi8kEkO+7GB qRyygJI0k9HM2dlccBxtoD13Ww== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:64cb:: with SMTP id p11-v6mr11494968ejn.181.1542976260719; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 04:31:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:569e:0:3106:d637:d723:e855]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e35sm9195196eda.13.2018.11.23.04.30.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Nov 2018 04:30:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:30:57 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Michal Hocko Cc: Daniel Vetter , LKML , Linux MM , Intel Graphics Development , DRI Development , Andrew Morton , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , David Rientjes , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Paolo Bonzini , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Message-ID: <20181123123057.GK4266@phenom.ffwll.local> Mail-Followup-To: Michal Hocko , LKML , Linux MM , Intel Graphics Development , DRI Development , Andrew Morton , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , David Rientjes , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Paolo Bonzini , Daniel Vetter References: <20181122165106.18238-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20181122165106.18238-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20181123111557.GG8625@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20181123111557.GG8625@dhcp22.suse.cz> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 4.18.0-2-amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:15:57PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 22-11-18 17:51:04, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Just a bit of paranoia, since if we start pushing this deep into > > callchains it's hard to spot all places where an mmu notifier > > implementation might fail when it's not allowed to. > > What does WARN give you more than the existing pr_info? Is really > backtrace that interesting? Automated tools have to ignore everything at info level (there's too much of that). I guess I could do something like if (blockable) pr_warn(...) else pr_info(...) WARN() is simply my goto tool for getting something at warning level dumped into dmesg. But I think the pr_warn with the callback function should be enough indeed. If you wonder where all the info level stuff happens that we have to ignore: suspend/resume is a primary culprit (fairly important for gfx/desktops), but there's a bunch of other places. Even if we ignore everything at info and below we still need filters because some drivers are a bit too trigger-happy (i915 definitely included I guess, so everyone contributes to this problem). Cheers, Daniel > > > Cc: Andrew Morton > > Cc: Michal Hocko > > Cc: "Christian K?nig" > > Cc: David Rientjes > > Cc: Daniel Vetter > > Cc: "J?r?me Glisse" > > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > --- > > mm/mmu_notifier.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c > > index 5119ff846769..59e102589a25 100644 > > --- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c > > +++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c > > @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ int __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mm_struct *mm, > > pr_info("%pS callback failed with %d in %sblockable context.\n", > > mn->ops->invalidate_range_start, _ret, > > !blockable ? "non-" : ""); > > + WARN(blockable,"%pS callback failure not allowed\n", > > + mn->ops->invalidate_range_start); > > ret = _ret; > > } > > } > > -- > > 2.19.1 > > > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch