Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:37:42 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To:     Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, ssantosh@kernel.org,
        ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, s-anna@ti.com,
        nsekhar@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, nsaulnier@ti.com, jreeder@ti.com,
        m-karicheri2@ti.com, woods.technical@gmail.com,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] soc: ti: pruss: Add a PRUSS irqchip driver for
 PRUSS interrupts
Message-ID: <20181123163742.GC53235@atomide.com>
References: <1542886753-17625-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com>
 <1542886753-17625-9-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1542886753-17625-9-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [181122 11:39]:
> The PRUSS INTC module is reference counted during the interrupt
> setup phase through the irqchip's irq_request_resources() and
> irq_release_resources() ops. This restricts the module from being
> removed as long as there are active interrupt users.

So are there any reasons why this could not be just a regular
drivers/irqchip driver nowadays?

Regards,

Tony