Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To:     Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        carlos <carlos@redhat.com>,
        Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
        libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation
References: <20181121183936.8176-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
        <686626451.10113.1542901620250.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <87wop5xeit.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
        <1045257294.10291.1542905262086.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <87k1l5xd33.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
        <20181122171010.GH23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
        <871s7cvt1l.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
        <20181123142843.GJ23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
        <1150466925.11664.1542992720871.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <20181123173019.GK23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date:   Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:39:04 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20181123173019.GK23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (Rich Felker's
        message of "Fri, 23 Nov 2018 12:30:19 -0500")
Message-ID: <87zhtzsngn.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Rich Felker:

> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:05:20PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> There has been presumptions about signals being blocked when the thread
>> exits throughout this email thread. Out of curiosity, what code is
>> responsible for disabling signals in this situation ? Related to this,
>> is it valid to access a IE model TLS variable from a signal handler at
>> _any_ point where the signal handler nests over thread's execution ?
>> This includes early start and just before invoking the exit system call.
>
> It should be valid to access *any* TLS object like this, but the
> standards don't cover it well.

C++ makes it undefined:

  <http://eel.is/c++draft/support.signal#def:evaluation,signal-safe>

Thanks,
Florian