Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:40:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:40:41 -0500 Received: from [213.96.124.18] ([213.96.124.18]:61423 "HELO dardhal") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:39:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:37:41 +0000 From: =?us-ascii?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Domingo_L=F3pez?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Plans for 2.5 Message-ID: <20010329013741.A6451@dardhal.mired.net> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: ; from jisla@elogica.com.br on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:44:52PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 28 March 2001, at 19:44:52 -0300, Bruno Avila wrote: > Hello people, > > I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What is > planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux already > is stable or well done for nature, we could thing more on performance to be > a diferencial over others. What do you people thing? > My two cents. I'd like to see Linux VM subsystem "stabilize". By now, with 2.4.x I have the subjective impression that memory management is a bit worse that on 2.2.x. For example, the kernel starts allocating much swap space even when there is still plenty of free physical RAM. Also, it tends not to balance well between cached/buffered data and swap space. Finally, when an application ends and releases memroy, swap space allocated by this application _seems_ not to be freed (that, AFAIK, is a know issue being addressed). Don't know if this is 2.5.x stuff or can be integrated into later 2.4.x releases. By the way, it has been mentioned in this list that work is underway to develop new capability based features for the kernel. Does it have anything to do with capabilities as provided by LIDS ?. Is there a plan on integrating this and/or other patches in the mainstream kernel ?. Argh, too many things at once, and the worst one is that I can't help a lot on anyone. I expect not to have given developers a bit of extra work :) -- Jos? Luis Domingo L?pez Linux Registered User #189436 Debian GNU/Linux Potato (P166 64 MB RAM) jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org => ? Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/