Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181125212159.11590-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
 <CAK8P3a2FXsz4-fBvUuQ6J5ERDkK6QsBoKvLLsDsczZqCOrq3Kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP9ODKqDySwsJ+3hJFXYfm8NyhsVGDwyRi+3sUUJiP304SU07g@mail.gmail.com> <CAK8P3a3bCK4MxXoCmzfdgvELz9dNgOkACb1Gzpf8vRH8Cd-FnA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3bCK4MxXoCmzfdgvELz9dNgOkACb1Gzpf8vRH8Cd-FnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 25 Nov 2018 20:21:27 -0200
Message-ID: <CAP9ODKr3kQjEcKGwiVpsnFTFEEzjTxP0HdJYsQuc7jvqLEBypA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Remove explicit
 ARM_UNWIND disable
To:     arnd@arndb.de
Cc:     Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello Arnd,

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:48 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:45 PM Otavio Salvador
> <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:35 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:24 PM Otavio Salvador
> > > <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND is removed when running 'savedefconfig', but
> > > > selected by the Kconfig logic.  This is done in preparation to making
> > > > further changes to this defconfig cleaner.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Does this mean we no longer get the unwinder, or there is some other
> > > config (which?) that unconditionally selects it?
> >
> > It is selected. Before changing the defconfig I did a savedefconfig to
> > avoid unrelated changes to be included on the subsequent patches and
> > then I found it was now selected.
>
> Ok, then please mention in the changelog which other option selects it,
> as I said.
>
> Aside from that, your series looks fine to me.

Thank you for reviewing it. I sent a v3 mentioning it.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854          Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750