Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        Fabio Berton <fabio.berton@ossystems.com.br>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] ARM: dts: rv1108: Fix the PMU interrupt number
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:58:48 +0100
Message-ID: <3361921.c4PKPBIJKP@phil>
In-Reply-To: <20181125211907.9895-8-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
References: <20181125211907.9895-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <20181125211907.9895-8-otavio@ossystems.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Otavio,

Am Sonntag, 25. November 2018, 22:19:02 CET schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> According to the Rockchip vendor tree the PMU interrupt number is
> 76, so fix it accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Berton <fabio.berton@ossystems.com.br>

looks ok, especially as the TRM I have doesn't list neither irqs :-)
But please explain the second Signed-off by Fabio?

If Fabio is the original author, the patch From should reflect that
and the Signed-off-by lines should be swapped. As it is now
I would expect Fabio being the one sending the patches.
Or is it supposed to be a "Co-developed-by:"?
See Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst.


Thanks
Heiko