Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc:     Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, carlos <carlos@redhat.com>,
        Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
        libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation
References: <20181121183936.8176-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
        <20181123142843.GJ23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
        <1150466925.11664.1542992720871.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <20181123173019.GK23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
        <865273158.11687.1542995541389.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <20181123183558.GM23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
        <1758017676.12041.1543007347347.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <87bm6cqm31.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
        <688718071.12798.1543247469553.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:03:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <688718071.12798.1543247469553.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        (Mathieu Desnoyers's message of "Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:51:09 -0500
        (EST)")
Message-ID: <874lc3omh5.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Mathieu Desnoyers:

> So let's make __rseq_abi and __rseq_refcount strong symbols then ?

Yes, please.  (But I'm still not sure we need the reference counter.)

Thanks,
Florian