Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp265177imu; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:02:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/V0LDGWzco5QCQlldRFcNDJSTJg51bpuqggUppWMjjzOKsgDaDs5tYO3+8YVYKV7hjL2irF X-Received: by 2002:a65:40c5:: with SMTP id u5mr26985375pgp.46.1543294945376; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:02:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543294945; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jeiI9ev5kPXQbtWRBtB5ZvQuIrIYytMv4w+1/Tdzb1OUJ39x2ltOQBhHt5W+GdbXZI 6ckb21jW4BjnF9JxvNEnIjkROU36Mqkmk/pI6W8CcS7QC/qU82eekQLe9cFekbtiUXoj xreLXwIrYKJZ9ayL1Y9hPrJRP9eNx5WJsdL8KLOiVuerlLzpMz4gYJ+QPgyj6wjG24sU aJOkNQa4C8M2buwLHNGAFdk7ykAaE9tXqWcL1qGBlm0N0ExWFDPsgofpoNqAkDla4mrO Rn/EjG1T3321jW/HI4lbbRchbwLeYlckb6JfQp40ZxslNVljrvZZEsIcQAhBxojz+BtI tkaQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=Y9pkA4gnVb0lkVNA1MvuXkql3DDp6H5j2YGh3hHcLMw=; b=gRpPMAM8rgy4dRe76XadBGZgGZaIud/IU0w03Dyb2EAQTpHFRJbI52FLbwymGOh+IO p1jICA1cdGjb8k0rTenLLnIjWAviaMHARkhP5e5p3ZYxs120GmPWlr/qkQZPeQoGoUx4 m8hD/6xwQkONS0uyRm/llzHoKZ2vBdx7dXXzgJtBu7S8/H78a1HZHDLISN1HgEuX7F7o cJ3F6hGcm04ZeD6LRJ2rhqgTLLeCpAvHzwFSFBtO7YtCT0LgN+8y1DCBJAn7n2NDTzYY gMXhSPAufnSNPR3mjUIgFq/UZr5j/Bl9Fh1Ohel2EHvmlhjRv5uTUQqnv8lt7DoWWIzJ llEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5si2602769pgf.579.2018.11.26.21.02.09; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:02:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728574AbeK0Pt2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:49:28 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:52362 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727974AbeK0Pt1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:49:27 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::bf5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA88E14C66CD8; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:52:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:52:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20181126.205247.1196368459821644290.davem@davemloft.net> To: jelsasser@appneta.com Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <40FD0CE5-973C-4A7F-91BD-66C1A1699223@appneta.com> <937675447ad1ec2665d0b6f70390d498a01255d0.camel@intel.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:52:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Josh Elsasser Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:54:11 -0800 > Jeff Kirsher wrote: > >> No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes" >> tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I >> have in my tree for validation and review. > > Thanks, let’s try that. > > Fixes: e23f33367882 ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+”) Unfortunately, patchwork isn't smart enough to pick up Fixes: tags still.