Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:37:15 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: move the arm arch_dma_alloc implementation to common code
Message-ID: <20181127073715.GA30033@lst.de>
References: <20181105121931.13481-1-hch@lst.de> <20181109075238.GA27578@lst.de> <20181115195041.GC4535@brain-police> <b3267453-0c2d-4bda-2122-d6212967dafc@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b3267453-0c2d-4bda-2122-d6212967dafc@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:58:04PM -0800, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2018-11-15 11:50 am, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Can I get a quick review from the arm64 folks?  I think it should
>>> be fine there as it basically is a code move, but an additional pair
>>> or two of eyes always helps to weed out bugs.
>>
>> I reviewed the arm64 parts, but it would be ideal if Robin could have a look
>> as well.
>
> Yup, from a quick skim the general shape of the whole series looks 
> pleasing, but I've been holding off going through it in detail until I've 
> figured out what's up with the last thing I thought I'd reviewed 
> exhaustively...
>
> Either way I'll make some time for a proper look next week once I'm back.

Did you get a chance to look over this?