Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp228207imu; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:28:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UgRcWc8/hnMUjjn9DtAkFfZoOEQ2YtbyFFbzS20ESm/54behqnQDCaa+QQAcwSYVDyuq2W X-Received: by 2002:a63:2ac9:: with SMTP id q192mr30368387pgq.58.1543346881986; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:28:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543346881; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fjJqdSV1/qpuyeBQsw5htJd031pbju0aGEfzl6BXDyXe0kUINt24+wUeH0tkwC7Hdc jv7+YDhn0NaANKYesl5vsK9XuDf1p9jBpDyrXSKOB3vC0W010cynRMzNd1kqO/Qbpx5i ZHe5ng+gDFmNzUEVvpuKOJmNCXrhVg6fGTjfasO4dKwToOz+3vjgP/ccHAbHq+6TZdVP caqUwjhUE4XADF12qQ55UtqEaPLhf3wJt5ng6nJIn7dtKrU98S32GVoSoGJBzby3EyYu zAWQLASMlJkP/apVTZaLl2hrFuf2UqeVRsDoXPVmBUGaW7Ub4cZJHE7aZa1aPM1/Fni/ VUBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=IQAGrI12brA3Wd7D87+OXKGvAaSFouSDn1ZyPAJIYIo=; b=Sdn0zi9aIZODFqtdhD1z2LXZ2cMMRjqDXfjunOKf5JzUBnFfjQb7V8M6c3ANxN6M32 IgbylRk6ntz/XBKxXx25jylQRgSEGeCYsw9+If9Cx6SAqVMkCtkZ35JflBc9wabh3Ivo go6dAyMcPFWJewtQ6AGpOd9XtXuq4mJlBWzHAbww/v5C5vtWDLLaK1P3FW0comVujGR3 nGlseMJF5BUYHowaYRgCXO9zYgszG5dD3kwi7kbZF+nAJ9+z9ro/mywLPzsjCNKrh6Wz k3xYj2Nq+ahl47efIA6wDq1qjh+P0irWDOGKXy0ZuaFARp6fkeUuwg12eHQv5pvexEft t1QQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lgbAygGk; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b4si4377977pgk.350.2018.11.27.11.27.46; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:28:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lgbAygGk; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731599AbeK1EVv (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:21:51 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:52439 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731571AbeK1EVv (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:21:51 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id r11-v6so22577446wmb.2; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:23:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IQAGrI12brA3Wd7D87+OXKGvAaSFouSDn1ZyPAJIYIo=; b=lgbAygGkJj0xdVpVYd8uCRqPuJZQbQtZ8X0U5VtNr1ky3AnAsyxPRBsf04KVqmx1Uc xWxaY31PPOec6k/6L4zy1M2AfCGq4gobWQQ6T+8b6rlNNvOD+lILc4KGU4cMv8JiD0TE /keUwTnjoEYZd24IwmlbPYLwU4r/NpS4RLDFgPee5YJctvSy8eKtd1e9Co5AcswCn78c LeE6Hj1p+6C0cXRW60WIf2qEbD5zRVM9ArT07XZZ140ULl7aNTgLDRiykWnnc/AnDfFA 44h7qQtszxbCKuco+NOQlBsDelkZybSOJgSGA8J2fhuXFXcZ+pf36VygoEWkZEPpN0XW qoCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IQAGrI12brA3Wd7D87+OXKGvAaSFouSDn1ZyPAJIYIo=; b=UiLiSTeNDvkLQpr6thMAwY2NEyM3aLCAquN4RhrdLauyXqlBa+CnL2UblMTKnCdUi4 zQzvhXHD6+wy5xa09a6KOphtZswzNZvzz9UY3t3bNhlO2k9LDJOHL2xYjN8LiZEyGaQk ZFqmlZm69G0k1CSg080W1PGyWJcjkr4iMl9kt9jqti1PMUXaj1MeyvTPtWOKK8DuYffY jI5AIcH/5gAC6iduL7HNrPDZG4M448EqEklZOO1DjKVNZKl48iX5rNyHp+lKLUXFI7A1 G3wYlyHzOJ4Xo0LVtOP6CS1IuAQx8dh7reSzvJf69SdPyrUlFCNbUQM7YSeH1KCy5EFk YnFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJ3wwmuDSNUM8zDPM+hoRIA2z3EF7TEUuiMHPt8v1+6JHOdLfRN 3FtUCDBnJ4AbAsvaydwswNY= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:3a8d:: with SMTP id h135-v6mr28321627wma.92.1543339393688; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:23:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from jernej-laptop.localnet (cpe1-8-82.cable.triera.net. [213.161.8.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q12sm3715966wrx.31.2018.11.27.09.23.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:23:12 -0800 (PST) From: Jernej =?utf-8?B?xaBrcmFiZWM=?= To: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, maxime.ripard@bootlin.com Cc: hans.verkuil@cisco.com, acourbot@chromium.org, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, Laurent Pinchart , tfiga@chromium.org, posciak@chromium.org, Paul Kocialkowski , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com, jenskuske@gmail.com, Thomas Petazzoni , Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 1/2] media: uapi: Add H264 low-level decoder API compound controls. Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:23:10 +0100 Message-ID: <2123591.3TCVFQjlgd@jernej-laptop> In-Reply-To: <20181115145650.9827-2-maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> References: <20181115145650.9827-1-maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> <20181115145650.9827-2-maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! Dne =C4=8Detrtek, 15. november 2018 ob 15:56:49 CET je Maxime Ripard napisa= l(a): > From: Pawel Osciak >=20 > Stateless video codecs will require both the H264 metadata and slices in > order to be able to decode frames. >=20 > This introduces the definitions for a new pixel format for H264 slices th= at > have been parsed, as well as the structures used to pass the metadata from > the userspace to the kernel. >=20 > Co-Developed-by: Maxime Ripard > Signed-off-by: Pawel Osciak > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > --- > Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/biblio.rst | 9 + > .../media/uapi/v4l/extended-controls.rst | 364 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../media/uapi/v4l/pixfmt-compressed.rst | 20 + > .../media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-queryctrl.rst | 30 ++ > .../media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions | 5 + > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c | 42 ++ > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c | 1 + > include/media/v4l2-ctrls.h | 10 + > include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h | 166 ++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 11 + > 10 files changed, 658 insertions(+) >=20 > @@ -1156,4 +1164,162 @@ struct v4l2_ctrl_mpeg2_quantization { > __u8 chroma_non_intra_quantiser_matrix[64]; > }; >=20 > +/* Compounds controls */ > + > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_CONSTRAINT_SET0_FLAG 0x01 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_CONSTRAINT_SET1_FLAG 0x02 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_CONSTRAINT_SET2_FLAG 0x04 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_CONSTRAINT_SET3_FLAG 0x08 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_CONSTRAINT_SET4_FLAG 0x10 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_CONSTRAINT_SET5_FLAG 0x20 How are these constraint flags meant to be used? > + > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_SEPARATE_COLOUR_PLANE 0x01 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_QPPRIME_Y_ZERO_TRANSFORM_BYPASS 0x02 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_DELTA_PIC_ORDER_ALWAYS_ZERO 0x04 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_GAPS_IN_FRAME_NUM_VALUE_ALLOWED 0x08 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_FRAME_MBS_ONLY 0x10 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_MB_ADAPTIVE_FRAME_FIELD 0x20 > +#define V4L2_H264_SPS_FLAG_DIRECT_8X8_INFERENCE 0x40 > + > +struct v4l2_ctrl_h264_sps { > + __u8 profile_idc; > + __u8 constraint_set_flags; > + __u8 level_idc; > + __u8 seq_parameter_set_id; > + __u8 chroma_format_idc; > + __u8 bit_depth_luma_minus8; > + __u8 bit_depth_chroma_minus8; > + __u8 log2_max_frame_num_minus4; > + __u8 pic_order_cnt_type; > + __u8 log2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4; > + __u8 max_num_ref_frames; > + __u8 num_ref_frames_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle; > + __s32 offset_for_ref_frame[255]; > + __s32 offset_for_non_ref_pic; > + __s32 offset_for_top_to_bottom_field; > + __u16 pic_width_in_mbs_minus1; > + __u16 pic_height_in_map_units_minus1; > + __u8 flags; > +}; > + > +#define V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_ENTROPY_CODING_MODE 0x0001 > +#define V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_BOTTOM_FIELD_PIC_ORDER_IN_FRAME_PRESENT 0x0002 > +#define V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_WEIGHTED_PRED 0x0004 > +#define V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_DEBLOCKING_FILTER_CONTROL_PRESENT 0x0008 > +#define V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_CONSTRAINED_INTRA_PRED 0x0010 > +#define V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_REDUNDANT_PIC_CNT_PRESENT 0x0020 > +#define V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_TRANSFORM_8X8_MODE 0x0040 > +#define V4L2_H264_PPS_FLAG_PIC_SCALING_MATRIX_PRESENT 0x0080 > + > +struct v4l2_ctrl_h264_pps { > + __u8 pic_parameter_set_id; > + __u8 seq_parameter_set_id; > + __u8 num_slice_groups_minus1; > + __u8 num_ref_idx_l0_default_active_minus1; > + __u8 num_ref_idx_l1_default_active_minus1; > + __u8 weighted_bipred_idc; > + __s8 pic_init_qp_minus26; > + __s8 pic_init_qs_minus26; > + __s8 chroma_qp_index_offset; > + __s8 second_chroma_qp_index_offset; > + __u8 flags; > +}; > + > +struct v4l2_ctrl_h264_scaling_matrix { > + __u8 scaling_list_4x4[6][16]; > + __u8 scaling_list_8x8[6][64]; > +}; > + > +struct v4l2_h264_weight_factors { > + __s8 luma_weight[32]; > + __s8 luma_offset[32]; > + __s8 chroma_weight[32][2]; > + __s8 chroma_offset[32][2]; > +}; Regarding weight type __s8 - isn't too small just a bit? ITU-T Rec. H264 (05/2003) says that this field has value between -128 to 12= 7 if=20 weight flag is set. That fits perfectly. However, when weight flag is 0, de= fault=20 value is 2^luma_log2_weight_denom (for example). luma_log2_weight_denom can= =20 have values between 0 and 7, which means that weight will have values from = 1=20 to 128. That is just slightly over the max value for __s8. __s8 is fine for offsets, though. Best regards, Jernej > + > +struct v4l2_h264_pred_weight_table { > + __u8 luma_log2_weight_denom; > + __u8 chroma_log2_weight_denom; > + struct v4l2_h264_weight_factors weight_factors[2]; > +};