Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 04:04:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 04:04:46 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de ([194.112.123.193]:5139 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 04:04:39 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:04:16 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andi Kleen , Bill Wendling , kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davies@maniac.ultranet.com Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10) Message-ID: <20001104100416.A10972@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20001103202911.A2979@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <200011031937.WAA10753@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20001103160108.D16644@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu> <3A033C82.114016A0@mandrakesoft.com> <20001104004129.C5173@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <3A0350EC.8B1A3B4D@mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A0350EC.8B1A3B4D@mandrakesoft.com>; from jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com on Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 06:57:32PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because > > it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its > > always MTU sized skbuffs. > > One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports > that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card. I have the same reports from various sources (but then they complain about the socket buffer issue ;) I think it would be best to just keep it as it is with minimal mainteance, even in 2.5. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/