Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261837AbUANRUu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:20:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261758AbUANRUu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:20:50 -0500 Received: from h192n2fls310o1003.telia.com ([81.224.187.192]:59288 "EHLO cambrant.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262052AbUANRUf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:20:35 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:20:22 +0100 From: Tim Cambrant To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: [Newbie-warning] MOD_INC_USE_COUNT usage Message-ID: <20040114172022.GA2112@cambrant.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1858 Lines: 46 With the high risk of being flamed, I send this to LKML. Feel free to tell me not to if this is a huge no-no, and it won't happen again. I was studying some of the warnings that appears when compiling 2.6.1-mm3, and one common warning is the MOD_INC_USE_COUNT macro being used. Apparently it's deprecated, but if that's the case, why is it still being used in the kernel? I googled a bit and found a few discussions about the issue (mostly concerning the /mm-subsystem) where some people found it okay to just remove the call to MOD_INC_USE_COUNT totally, since it is totally unnecessary under 2.5 (and under 2.6 too, I presume). Since the discussions provided a lot of contradictions and no solution, I thought asking a question to someone who has an idea of what this is about might be a good thing. I'm not asking you to remove this call, but I do want to know why it shouldn't be removed and what is being done to replace a function (or macro... whatever it is) that is deprecated. Any explanations would be gratefully accepted. Thank you. Since I'm no kernel-hacker (and not much of a coder at all) don't expect me to understand a lot of jargon, but this question is being asked because I'm really interested in understanding the Linux kernel. So, why shouldn't this patch be applied?: --- drivers/ide/pci/generic.c.orig 2004-01-14 17:52:35.000000000 +0100 +++ drivers/ide/pci/generic.c 2003-11-24 13:54:01.000000000 +0100 @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static int __devinit generic_init_one(st return 1; } ide_setup_pci_device(dev, d); + MOD_INC_USE_COUNT; return 0; } Tim Cambrant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/