Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:10:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:10:06 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:27917 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:09:51 -0500 Subject: Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86 To: andrew.grover@intel.com (Grover, Andrew) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 05:10:59 +0100 (BST) Cc: pavel@suse.cz ('Pavel Machek'), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), sfr@canb.auug.org.au, twoller@crystal.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4148FEAAD879D311AC5700A0C969E8905DE7D2@orsmsx35.jf.intel.com> from "Grover, Andrew" at Mar 28, 2001 03:12:01 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I know on ACPI systems you are guaranteed a PM timer running at ~3.57 Mhz. > Could udelay use that, or are there other timers that are better (maybe > without the ACPI dependency)? We could use that if ACPI was present. It might be worth exploring. Is this PM timer well defined for accesses ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/