Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262164AbUANSbQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:31:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262683AbUANSbQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:31:16 -0500 Received: from host.globalsecureserver.com ([209.239.37.116]:6859 "EHLO host.globalsecureserver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262164AbUANSal (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:30:41 -0500 Message-ID: <40058AC2.4040505@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:30:26 -0600 From: Dick Hollenbeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: User Mode Linux Patches for 2.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 451 Lines: 10 Some of the news blips about 2.6 said the UML was integrated into the kernel. Yet I see some UML patches for 2.6? Under what circumstances must the 2.6 kernel be patched to compile a UML guest kernel? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/