Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262792AbUANUDs (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:03:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262925AbUANUDd (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:03:33 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:65175 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266337AbUANUBq (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:01:46 -0500 From: James Cleverdon Reply-To: jamesclv@us.ibm.com Organization: IBM LTC To: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.1-mm2: Get irq_vector size right for generic subarch UP installer kernels Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:01:43 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Linux Kernel References: <1074108886.11035.59.camel@mulgrave> In-Reply-To: <1074108886.11035.59.camel@mulgrave> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141201.43324.jamesclv@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 915 Lines: 27 On Wednesday 14 January 2004 11:34 am, James Bottomley wrote: > I don't think this: > > +# if defined(CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT) || defined(CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH) > > Is a good idea. You're contaminating the default subarch with another > subarch specific #define. > > generic arch additions are fine here, but you should find a better way > to abstract the summit stuff. > > James Sorry, but we've had distro installer kernels, which are uni-proc generic subarch kernels, blow up with array overflows on large systems. What would you suggest I do instead? -- James Cleverdon IBM xSeries Linux Solutions {jamesclv(Unix, preferred), cleverdj(Notes)} at us dot ibm dot comm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/