Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:38:29 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: Fix to enable syscall events on arm64
Message-Id: <20181129143829.5917e021741a2a883b28ea77@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181128195921.GA32668@arm.com>
References: <CAA93ih1-xpm1P0suT6SNCc_ARvAfyBEwb0-uKFikM5k4CvG8jg@mail.gmail.com>
        <154333618522.27355.8094935453351562295.stgit@devbox>
        <20181127165848.GA19569@arm.com>
        <20181127131859.79ce7da9@gandalf.local.home>
        <20181128085555.a8987cbe18aa6d1d1f0a827e@kernel.org>
        <20181128120502.GC24868@arm.com>
        <20181128092223.2a100448@gandalf.local.home>
        <20181128195921.GA32668@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 19:59:22 +0000
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:22:23AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:05:02 +0000
> > Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ok! Then please add a comment to arch_syscall_match_sym_name() along those
> > > lines, and you can add my ack:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > 
> > Shouldn't this go through your tree?
> 
> Yup; I'm hoping Catalin will pick it up as a fix for 4.20 (we take it in
> turns, so I'm looking at stuff for 4.21 atm).

OK, I'll add a comment about compat syscalls. BTW, this should be applied
to 4.19 too, since without this, no one can use syscall events on arm64.

Thank you,


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>