Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266362AbUAOBML (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:12:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266369AbUAOBMK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:12:10 -0500 Received: from news.cistron.nl ([62.216.30.38]:6353 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266362AbUAOBMI (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:12:08 -0500 From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" Subject: Re: Slow NFS performance over wireless! Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Cistron Group Message-ID: References: <200401130155.32894.hackeron@dsl.pipex.com> <1074025508.1987.10.camel@lumiere> <1074026758.4524.65.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1074129127 10991 62.216.29.200 (15 Jan 2004 01:12:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1417 Lines: 28 In article <1074026758.4524.65.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org>, Trond Myklebust wrote: >There are a couple of performance related patches that should be applied >to stock 2.6.0/2.6.1. One handles a problem with remove_suid() >generating a whole load of SETATTR calls if you are writing to a file >that has the "x" bit set. The other handles an efficiency issue related >to random write + read combinations. > >Either look for them on my website (under >http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src), or apply Andrew's 2.6.1-mm2 patch. If one runs bonnie on a NFS mounted share, what should the rewrite throughput be? On an NFS server locally (2.6.1-mm3) I get as write/rewrite/read speeds 107 / 25 / 110 MB/sec, CPU loads of a few percent. On an NFS client (2.6.1-mm3, filesystem mounted with options udp,nfsvers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768) I get for the same share as write/rewrite/read speeds 36 / 4 / 38 MB/sec. CPU load is also very high on the client for the rewrite case (80%). That's with back-to-back GigE, full duplex, MTU 9000, P IV 3.0 Ghz. (I tried MTU 5000 and 1500 as well, doesn't really matter). Is that what would be expected ? Mike. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/