Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181129055559.159228-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20181129055559.159228-52-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20181129121922.GL19305@dastard>
In-Reply-To: <20181129121922.GL19305@dastard>
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:36:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxha4-DhcHQwvWbWuh5QXcDKYJ_b7HVGtT23D_gtkqkQ0A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 52/68] iomap: sub-block dio needs to zeroout
 beyond EOF
To:     Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc:     sashal@kernel.org, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Luis R. Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> Same again - what's the test plan for these cherry-picked data
> corruption fixes?
>

Dave,

Just to check if we are on the same page, if this was the test plan:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg20639.html

Would "no regressions from baseline" have been sufficient to validate
those specific patches are solid for stable?

Thanks,
Amir.