Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@amazon.de>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 095/100] rcu: Make need_resched() respond to urgent RCU-QS needs
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:13:05 +0100
Message-Id: <20181129140106.967088733@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181129140058.768942700@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20181129140058.768942700@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 92aa39e9dc77481b90cbef25e547d66cab901496 upstream.

The per-CPU rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs variable communicates an urgent
need for an RCU quiescent state from the force-quiescent-state processing
within the grace-period kthread to context switches and to cond_resched().
Unfortunately, such urgent needs are not communicated to need_resched(),
which is sometimes used to decide when to invoke cond_resched(), for
but one example, within the KVM vcpu_run() function.  As of v4.15, this
can result in synchronize_sched() being delayed by up to ten seconds,
which can be problematic, to say nothing of annoying.

This commit therefore checks rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs from within
rcu_check_callbacks(), which is invoked from the scheduling-clock
interrupt handler.  If the current task is not an idle task and is
not executing in usermode, a context switch is forced, and either way,
the rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs variable is set to false.  If the current
task is an idle task, then RCU's dyntick-idle code will detect the
quiescent state, so no further action is required.  Similarly, if the
task is executing in usermode, other code in rcu_check_callbacks() and
its called functions will report the corresponding quiescent state.

Reported-by: Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@amazon.de>
Reported-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Backported to make patch apply cleanly on older versions. ]
Tested-by: Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@amazon.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12.x - 4.19.x
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2772,6 +2772,15 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
 		rcu_bh_qs();
 	}
 	rcu_preempt_check_callbacks();
+	/* The load-acquire pairs with the store-release setting to true. */
+	if (smp_load_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs))) {
+		/* Idle and userspace execution already are quiescent states. */
+		if (!rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() && !user) {
+			set_tsk_need_resched(current);
+			set_preempt_need_resched();
+		}
+		__this_cpu_write(rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs, false);
+	}
 	if (rcu_pending())
 		invoke_rcu_core();
 	if (user)