Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2748347imu; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:35:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UKNEzwWkhbCw9E3f2pDgK7erzXzDbL0t66Hg24MiutY3h1XG0Iw4XPXUNdkPLt7HQj5Jqi X-Received: by 2002:a62:68c5:: with SMTP id d188mr2357400pfc.194.1543512919735; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:35:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543512919; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jKyiaYHo9U4rhTznygNuGe7DlTYKNtBhLydSZDePAEGat62SQswdw+asqdw4XE5N+P K7BjHzj7l5/rHN6Zt8EJlobynlZW26L0Fbs3BM9goCS0zR3JjfjYRbHC9+sJUsp4j6Z9 ht6+8kq1hCgkg00eijwEx44MGJL87Yarnd5QbtcgjAkWwJYw9erSPO7qUR/K2ppDsOTh u3nbdb4RCDMG9ongxEWVKoOZb+E1Rv4hpbzFHYED6f0Xp3tA0BqrYVlnTKdZmESkACj6 HyZrFSWjb8F+mDCknaUYMtodrezjf9hB5v+OHR0QQbz+V8fSJwXMFPDS2hJGP78OFhUp 3CvQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=xqD7o4MHZv+Oi4/Hfici0afEYbeABMQC9kEIregTpVA=; b=QXQJtaVRLIcEkhgHYJluSrxEuWgsTpKdosMZ5oB2PGa99mJ39Knlb6eaDw8y4mNBES cntHLYfFFBfrTZX02RfZkPuPygkze5hUekGaV82nDS+TOGNe/YppqkcyAApPdc+pi9q/ G+VUK2v5+ysnIg38PSPX4+7VLgoyeI1y2aTm6Pq9eYzuiDHiODBdbJcVVl9bcjwoGSzM pUOAmq+K1f1ZY8DW93DhxyrYPCPSDM7kTCrXdsEqQ0FvSyU/J8d3SeoylY9e1ACOTgjL 7o/CRkK8hehmwOIzN8EnWno9xjqelBc/+HUXNzKD30ho8WpsI5s7XUbiM7j8XQmQikBh PK7Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=OMjuABIi; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r12si2670085plo.59.2018.11.29.09.34.56; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:35:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=OMjuABIi; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730368AbeK3Ehy (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:37:54 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:34101 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728535AbeK3Ehy (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:37:54 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id y185so6881071wmd.1; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:31:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xqD7o4MHZv+Oi4/Hfici0afEYbeABMQC9kEIregTpVA=; b=OMjuABIiID5UzhcPfTqNecQZQZxByiORVEv3roioLhWwwTkmlqyt/R6YKt9bol2psb WDOEbXcLcr2nBEqGhj9hlWPY/u9P0TgQYwmi4ITv4J1gLw+b2qk8bV5FJdj8N7+4rd6p 1G/HBL08HRCmH/hO6uZ1rG9VtdopMUSGeV/e7335YfZkRfqAtXTut0/4yD8F5C0KmZT8 JsFDHDY9pOTWYzVXOTVMHSGMOKM+IjFXScMcIQWey/QaDpmxw8dtJLXuhOsM4GcQXcb5 2jfuvc7acXSmEiaP2pY7kTRxZzu1M8w7KK4fVmo3yACigrdXf4bUjF+c8m4vQ4R4AgvT HN5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xqD7o4MHZv+Oi4/Hfici0afEYbeABMQC9kEIregTpVA=; b=QLby4MLF9t7IFjG/QmyyF+/sSoC0I5KlH6JYCh0GhyR/7dgtLi9kAQzz/IY78426Pk eaxhBcIDL68MpulkRXhs47nRR246/cXNvqpOG9DHRFo4zJscqBdCByZ/bCA7rcSS1RAk B3a5oQ7+mm9rjmhbUVLOb0ZYAlqeRV6GfM9LBLBApMADKR1GKy45Mu26OpwF+UFlzvEo WSk2ez7091wzF3tXvZzD50MZ5onDkXsJUXV5Ia+wJ0kk/lCTQXg7XFcy2xQQWqhxONhg YIzYVebGRzyDFAqI3M/Nc7taQrFBV7XwMIJkTYoWp3J5rFpFAE1bmVba3Thg1/qQMQeX /Pzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbF5v96rN8ZCU6/YXCie5BPxqmdFgHsSOLPldQeg9jIpE3qpEo4 IojdI5+GjgWfTi/N2qr1kMgcO1GbTrQ1ZaUrTcE= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:af07:: with SMTP id y7mr2428645wme.94.1543512705394; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:31:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181129135921.231283053@linuxfoundation.org> <20181129135922.602882966@linuxfoundation.org> <20181129160722.GA31919@kroah.com> <20181129171038.GA4651@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20181129171038.GA4651@kroah.com> From: Tigran Aivazian Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:31:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 033/110] bfs: add sanity check at bfs_fill_super() To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org, Tetsuo Handa , syzbot , Andrew Morton , willy@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 17:10, Greg KH wrote: > Your patch has to apply on top of the existing one, so there's not an > issue here. > And might as well fix it now, as I can never count on a "future" patch > getting merged. It is already fixed, i.e. it applies cleanly against the existing (i.e. 4.19.5) kernel. What I meant is that, there is little or no point in applying a short-lived patch as there is no conceivable reason that it can become a long-lived one. Whatever else may have changed (all for the better of course) in the past 20 years in Linux kernel development, I presume the basic fundamental fact that no patch is accepted if the relevant maintainer has objections to it is still intact. And I am both the author and the maintainer of the BFS filesystem. Kind regards, Tigran