Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:02:06 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4
Message-ID: <20181129170206.GA27951@lst.de>
References: <20181114082314.8965-1-hch@lst.de> <20181127074253.GB30186@lst.de> <87zhttfonk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87zhttfonk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:05:19PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Is the plan that you take these via the dma-mapping tree or that they go
> via powerpc?

In principle either way is fine with me.  If it goes through the powerpc
tree we might run into a few minor conflicts with the dma-mapping tree
depending on how some of the current discussions go.