Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3094365imu; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:31:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WYIjVlyoruJsVXbyAnY+MdvS2+S/L28tLWLZ9mlQNp/uAkBwxAQ455RbhKFetAOlka94a9 X-Received: by 2002:a62:c683:: with SMTP id x3mr3315645pfk.10.1543534306536; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:31:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543534306; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Iysl1jyfTn1ko9qhrVSB5JBiD37ovJVVTpEKAXtyeD29YO5DFnd1iL8s4dyX9w8EGu wJAPtmYB5Pd1uur0nkQyzjGnZ6E9BHbe9vXZvxkZLA5PmchuGrDMnbQi+2A/3IPJb5yf UIgCPr5oO5Itg6EYhDgh8CjOwlBs6oq+WsFtO8zoYfAWbQIy8zvm5rjI2WHcvxCNrqEY FL6LO77bpobjbmZgJ+sVqBFjigGMnEh8dj2ChmFNrJf8O9FXGAFtamYRNcT9nHzIDJeV DX3/gZU+iwH6aM65l3XXdorrq4sBj8QlcanJUKm5UZ0znfC39Nvq8dMz0Oso9IHzzSzW Ft5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=JZtT1khKRJMgXaURo+NXktllQK8vqWOSP9JFKeDnpu8=; b=D7XOpSY0ORCsAyb96V22gkgXmoYimUCc0KNcma1H/+4Ld3GW3SGANuXN3ZE1iWsxkU eRRSre2q/PjBP/iy8GRt5VbtZLoCXyVExFe/M8Oac5ObzpVm6KYUsCH70i5f5O1psCpD RdwWyx/j/46W2aetFo2wJko6Y9V7Z1OSmZ4+H5TghRAdMfDaf8wynJb96RCRVKj/ukBF LkqThzgKfEhPvcsyNE7UOcX3FiJYVofrixiuStmpwUTx3yEqD3MH8Oet27IhFbovW9X7 oMkDQIqRr47tydpWlVsDSzTbl4TZ52LSFj4iuvN53AA2UL4ehjC/hZauOXePV87DNY50 WJPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@wdc.com header.s=dkim.wdc.com header.b=Gkp8j68L; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=wdc.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w7si3151265pgh.560.2018.11.29.15.31.31; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:31:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@wdc.com header.s=dkim.wdc.com header.b=Gkp8j68L; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=wdc.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727085AbeK3Kfo (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Nov 2018 05:35:44 -0500 Received: from esa5.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.153.144]:50484 "EHLO esa5.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726988AbeK3Kfn (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2018 05:35:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1543534111; x=1575070111; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references; bh=i7g213jXuExf9WQ9ppjwE4Ycti2qAbTHczLIWdNAD5A=; b=Gkp8j68LYZLPTmH7vVjKtDYVtWTBldQtMxWjbWlhjavOx1BAZNyAgKFL J/mT4poKRXPJ9zDJkaCMHXwJfe20R4iI8Gewh9XWe3NluBYWcMoRiTtb+ NEjroVDbr5KQ/B7Jz87adEqt0bgpzv9+hpA2Mklc3Lv+fJtchu6TVK4t0 ZC7TBPYd43x0Hkc8XSHcqhcyfe4+tZU4E5rcJheLp1laGPHcLJFcS6k1u 6Q4C6fSxUyoBBPi5hryCm5SD/Z6ZQJHQA8rT8m8rNFivoDGEc93seKxqI cLQB41/AKP2e1KG7h0hz6ed2JJd254IenBLB/6l4qPlChA6+ppnL+a8Z5 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,296,1539619200"; d="scan'208";a="96644309" Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.15]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2018 07:28:31 +0800 Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2018 15:11:28 -0800 Received: from jedi-01.sdcorp.global.sandisk.com (HELO jedi-01.int.fusionio.com) ([10.11.143.218]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2018 15:28:31 -0800 From: Atish Patra To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra , Albert Ou , Anup Patel , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Dmitriy Cherkasov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Jeremy Linton , Juri Lelli , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)), linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Morten Rasmussen , Palmer Dabbelt , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Sudeep Holla , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon Subject: [RFT PATCH v1 2/4] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding. Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:28:18 -0800 Message-Id: <1543534100-3654-3-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1543534100-3654-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> References: <1543534100-3654-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document to a common place. The relevant discussion can be found here. https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/6/19 Signed-off-by: Atish Patra --- .../{arm/topology.txt => cpu/cpu-topology.txt} | 81 ++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{arm/topology.txt => cpu/cpu-topology.txt} (86%) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt similarity index 86% rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt index 66848355..1de6fbce 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpu/cpu-topology.txt @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ =========================================== -ARM topology binding description +CPU topology binding description =========================================== =========================================== 1 - Introduction =========================================== -In an ARM system, the hierarchy of CPUs is defined through three entities that +In a SMP system, the hierarchy of CPUs is defined through three entities that are used to describe the layout of physical CPUs in the system: - socket @@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ are used to describe the layout of physical CPUs in the system: - core - thread -The cpu nodes (bindings defined in [1]) represent the devices that -correspond to physical CPUs and are to be mapped to the hierarchy levels. - The bottom hierarchy level sits at core or thread level depending on whether symmetric multi-threading (SMT) is supported or not. @@ -25,33 +22,37 @@ threads existing in the system and map to the hierarchy level "thread" above. In systems where SMT is not supported "cpu" nodes represent all cores present in the system and map to the hierarchy level "core" above. -ARM topology bindings allow one to associate cpu nodes with hierarchical groups +CPU topology bindings allow one to associate cpu nodes with hierarchical groups corresponding to the system hierarchy; syntactically they are defined as device tree nodes. -The remainder of this document provides the topology bindings for ARM, based -on the Devicetree Specification, available from: +Currently, only ARM/RISC-V intend to use this cpu topology binding but it may be +used for any other architecture as well. -https://www.devicetree.org/specifications/ +The remainder of this document provides the topology bindings for ARM/RISC-V, based +on the Devicetree Specification, available at [4]. + +The cpu nodes (bindings defined in [1] for ARM or [2] for RISC-V) represent the devices that +correspond to physical CPUs and are to be mapped to the hierarchy levels. If not stated otherwise, whenever a reference to a cpu node phandle is made its value must point to a cpu node compliant with the cpu node bindings as -documented in [1]. +documented in [1] or [3] for respective ISA. A topology description containing phandles to cpu nodes that are not compliant -with bindings standardized in [1] is therefore considered invalid. +with bindings standardized in [1] or [3] is therefore considered invalid. =========================================== 2 - cpu-map node =========================================== -The ARM CPU topology is defined within the cpu-map node, which is a direct +The ARM/RISC-V CPU topology is defined within the cpu-map node, which is a direct child of the cpus node and provides a container where the actual topology nodes are listed. - cpu-map node - Usage: Optional - On ARM SMP systems provide CPUs topology to the OS. - ARM uniprocessor systems do not require a topology + Usage: Optional - On SMP systems provide CPUs topology to the OS. + Uniprocessor systems do not require a topology description and therefore should not define a cpu-map node. @@ -494,8 +495,60 @@ cpus { }; }; +Example 3: HiFive Unleashed (RISC-V 64 bit, 4 core system) + +cpus { + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + compatible = "sifive,fu540g", "sifive,fu500"; + model = "sifive,hifive-unleashed-a00"; + + ... + + cpu-map { + cluster0 { + core0 { + cpu = <&L12>; + }; + core1 { + cpu = <&L15>; + }; + core2 { + cpu0 = <&L18>; + }; + core3 { + cpu0 = <&L21>; + }; + }; + }; + + L12: cpu@1 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "sifive,rocket0", "riscv"; + reg = <0x1>; + } + + L15: cpu@2 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "sifive,rocket0", "riscv"; + reg = <0x2>; + } + L18: cpu@3 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "sifive,rocket0", "riscv"; + reg = <0x3>; + } + L21: cpu@4 { + device_type = "cpu"; + compatible = "sifive,rocket0", "riscv"; + reg = <0x4>; + } +}; =============================================================================== [1] ARM Linux kernel documentation Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt [2] Devicetree NUMA binding description Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt +[3] RISC-V Linux kernel documentation + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.txt +[4] https://www.devicetree.org/specifications/ -- 2.7.4