Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] thermal: tegra: remove unnecessary warnings
To:     Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
CC:     <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        <srikars@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1543486183-2868-1-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com>
 <1543486183-2868-2-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com>
 <20181129163938.GA2045@localhost.localdomain>
From:   Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <380eb5fc-ed94-db87-9118-2fa8133d9c78@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:52:42 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181129163938.GA2045@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 30/11/2018 12:39 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:09:41PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> Convert warnings to info as not all platforms may
>> have all the thresholds and sensors enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
>> index ed28110a3535..55cc1f2f6a45 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
>> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev,
>>  
>>  	ret = tz->ops->get_crit_temp(tz, &temperature);
>>  	if (ret) {
>> -		dev_warn(dev, "thermtrip: %s: missing critical temperature\n",
>> +		dev_info(dev, "thermtrip: %s: missing critical temperature\n",
> 
> I am mostly ok with your change in direction. But are you sure this is a
> good thing? What about in the case that you have a platform that have
> the crit temp and you really failed to .get_crit_temp()?

If we set the crit temp in DT, but failed to .get_crit_temp(), it mean
the thermal framework have some problems. Since the critical trip is
very important, may be we should still keep "dev_warn" in here?

> 
>>  			 sg->name);
>>  		goto set_throttle;
>>  	}
>> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev,
>>  set_throttle:
>>  	ret = get_hot_temp(tz, &trip, &temperature);
>>  	if (ret) {
>> -		dev_warn(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing hot temperature\n",
>> +		dev_info(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing hot temperature\n",
>>  			 sg->name);
>>  		return 0;
>>  	}
>> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (i == THROTTLE_SIZE)
>> -		dev_warn(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing throttle cdev\n",
>> +		dev_info(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing throttle cdev\n",
>>  			 sg->name);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>