Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:09:59 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     "StDenis, Tom" <Tom.StDenis@amd.com>
Cc:     "dave.hansen@intel.com" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        "luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/mm/cpa: Fix cpa-array TLB invalidation
Message-ID: <20181130150959.GA11614@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20181130134455.490139778@infradead.org>
 <d1e4cb48-1952-fb61-bd2b-db9efe3b5f1a@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d1e4cb48-1952-fb61-bd2b-db9efe3b5f1a@amd.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:52:26PM +0000, StDenis, Tom wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Unfortunately I can't apply this on top of our drm-next the first patch 
> fails.

Against what tree would you like the patches? rebasing should not be
hard I think.