Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20181130.134808.1785785556132211918.davem@davemloft.net>
To:     jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com
Cc:     James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
        keescook@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        amir73il@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, dja@axtens.net,
        linux@dominikbrodowski.net, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        edumazet@google.com, federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it,
        geert+renesas@glider.be, deller@gmx.de, corbet@lwn.net,
        kumba@gentoo.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, paul.burton@mips.com, pmladek@suse.com,
        robh@kernel.org, sean.wang@mediatek.com,
        sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, shannon.nelson@oracle.com,
        sbrivio@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, me@tobin.cc,
        makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp, willemb@google.com, yhs@fb.com,
        yanjun.zhu@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
From:   David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20181130214405.GG23772@linux.intel.com>
References: <20181130205521.GA21006@linux.intel.com>
        <1543611662.3031.20.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
        <20181130214405.GG23772@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800

> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
>> No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't
>> necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading.  Our most heavily censored
>> medium is TV and "fuck" is now considered acceptable in certain
>> contexts on most channels in the UK and EU.
> 
> This makes following the CoC extremely hard to a non-native speaker as
> it is not too explicit on what is OK and what is not. I did through the
> whole thing with an eye glass and this what I deduced from it.

It would be helpful if you could explain what part of the language
is unclear wrt. explaining how CoC does not apply to existing code.

That part seems very explicit to me.