Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp4257469imu; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:50:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WQC4d4bLV3zt5NTgoF8itRkPhS2cz+zl5rsDKTy+eeyMnFlFTN4MIojNvBe3bhFyhQKckz X-Received: by 2002:a65:624c:: with SMTP id q12mr5025514pgv.379.1543614659141; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:50:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543614659; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CTYM3cK7omyZFXpEhGbxRDy7Bm7PgXBGsEWtBMoUlWz/OEiO6ibYyceOyyLEAqpD2h GuOobSIAuSJLPKXXMijIPPpTPXribcRMU5Iyf2qXg3vTj6SNhwY5Xo3v4Bp5tzCuxwDH LXnYuz+SE7n2mU8yWqf20YTHCfVC1yUMpFS8l5VCC8sEZoSMxo8vu2etLHIGPidWPulE WbW4PUox9i3sEBAf9+PLp+9pAZ545Dc1cioEwRbfJpvWw9jfB4Z1rC2oH/5nOkOhXAJs TEu4RvDTPyy9zaWARyCZOKVVNt+KePeHtYxsj5o1/jrRh7hQbsMQVWHjG+byTWXUoKyI PbOw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=OfV4XDRdudVoooX4qNv6t9+N+92pyBK9THLv9+bq2E4=; b=0+UhbZW359cd26kerWe0NzyWvobCxzYWET+V9HWRGWbU4l+XXG/4umL+jtogGwEu/L MKqlOZr9E4M2XoXtxWaxCWvH16eJ4BWp7qJGuCOYYaSPj1SAX5/n9UX9Qe4NzuKlVf2I D+yB7bB4Qs8WM5DtGGH/5QGfyhI7l3cXo3CV6vEmV5aUxNT0p7wljax2Aey8+c60v6Or 6npSPIgWtct3oBasNohrKc18hYg9T0GzKojslK7SAbjtEjek00eUGIr2haJF/EnkE+Lr QGlTwMHy7fd39I1HFTEcmUBt1q9BZqc/8zSzV5TnPhmYKFkO9fYHeshi/kDGgt6jUuY5 2Hdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p9si7132526pll.63.2018.11.30.13.50.44; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:50:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726772AbeLAJAp (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 04:00:45 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:48201 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726078AbeLAJAp (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 04:00:45 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Nov 2018 13:50:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,300,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="118888371" Received: from jsakkine-mobl1.jf.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.241.225.27]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2018 13:50:03 -0800 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:50:03 -0800 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Nikolay Borisov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Joshua Kinard , "open list:MIPS" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/15] MIPS: replace **** with a hug Message-ID: <20181130215003.GH23772@linux.intel.com> References: <20181130192737.15053-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181130192737.15053-2-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181130195758.GA20328@linux.intel.com> <9ba4d08d-10d1-c233-476a-c73051b8c9f5@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ba4d08d-10d1-c233-476a-c73051b8c9f5@suse.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:06:30PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > I find it quite ridiculous that grown up people are engaging at yet > another coc-related conversation and are on the way to blowing it out of > proportions. Let's focus on improving the ACTUAL code what's the point > to bikeshed on the word? > > I've seen people before me comment that some comments are plainly out of > date and that warrants their removal but otherwise nitpicking things > like that. It seems common sense is very scant these days... I have absolutely nothing against CoC. If you look up from LKML, there total zero posts from criticizing of having such. OK, maybe I find it bit too high-level, and yeah, this patch set has been useful to know where the line is. I can go through the commits and think more appropriate alternatives (thus the RFC-tag). Thanks. /Jarkko