Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:18:43 -0800
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc:     zohar@linux.ibm.com, david.safford@ge.com, monty.wiseman@ge.com,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] tpm: remove definition of TPM2_ACTIVE_PCR_BANKS
Message-ID: <20181130221843.GA26088@linux.intel.com>
References: <20181114153108.12907-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
 <20181114153108.12907-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
 <20181116133851.GB4163@linux.intel.com>
 <1602133e-6a41-ea97-d985-6eca0831898d@huawei.com>
 <4a55ba02-87e6-9258-038e-e4c57f00f033@huawei.com>
 <20181130194149.GA18584@linux.intel.com>
 <20181130194527.GB18584@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181130194527.GB18584@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:45:27AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:41:49AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Even after looking at the spec the last field does not make sense as the
> > event after digests and digests are not in union. It is just not right.
> > 
> > The comment does not fix that.
> 
> You should remove the last field and rename the struct as maybe
> struct tcg_pcr_event2_head. If we ever need the very last field
> we can create struct *_tail.
> 
> Not your fault but there is clear bug in the struct definition
> that should be fixed in a commit of its own.
> 
> No new comments are needed.

I checked and did not find the field even used anywhere. Can you
peer check this and then just remove it? And yeah maybe the struct
should have _head suffix.

/Jarkko