Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 1 Dec 2018 17:59:39 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] dma-mapping: move the remap helpers to a separate
 file
Message-ID: <20181201165939.GC20912@lst.de>
References: <20181105121931.13481-1-hch@lst.de> <20181105121931.13481-4-hch@lst.de> <eec8d6ba-d41a-51d4-d5ed-39982fed095d@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <eec8d6ba-d41a-51d4-d5ed-39982fed095d@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:05:06PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 12:19, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> The dma remap code only really makes sense for not cache coherent
>> architectures,
>
> And coherent ones with highmem, presumably? That can at least be the case 
> on 32-bit Arm, where coherent LPAE systems do exist (e.g. Calxeda Midway).

Ok, I've updated the commit log.