Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265248AbUAPDIy (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:08:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265251AbUAPDIy (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:08:54 -0500 Received: from gizmo09bw.bigpond.com ([144.140.70.19]:42691 "HELO gizmo09bw.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265248AbUAPDIw (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:08:52 -0500 Mail-Copies-To: never To: Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase recursive symlink limit from 5 to 8 Keywords: limit References: <2flllofnvp6.fsf@saruman.uio.no> <1073814570.4431.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <817jzsd8lg.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> From: Steve Youngs X-Face: #/1'_-|5_1$xjR,mVKhpfMJcRh8"k}_a{EkIO:Ox<]@zl/Yr|H,qH#3jJi6Aw(Mg@"!+Z"C N_S3!3jzW^FnPeumv4l#,E}J.+e%0q(U>#b-#`~>l^A!_j5AEgpU)>t+VYZ$:El7hLa1:%%L=3%B>n K{^jU_{& Organization: Linux Users - Fanatics Dept. X-URL: X-Request-PGP: X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 1659 2093 19D5 C06E D320 3A20 1D27 DB4B A94B 3003 X-Attribution: SY Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel List Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:08:43 +1000 In-Reply-To: <817jzsd8lg.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> (GOTO Masanori's message of "Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:45:47 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1650 Lines: 47 --=-=-= * GOTO Masanori writes: > But I still think 6 is too small from user level point of view When I first saw this thread I thought "yeah, that's a low limit", but now I'm not so sure. The truth is, up until a few days ago when this thread started, I wasn't even aware that there was a limit.[1] Which means, that for me at least, I have never had the need to exceed the limit. Because, if I had I would have discovered what that limit was. I'm not an "occasional dual-booting" Linux user, I've been using Linux _exclusively_ since late 1996. In that 7, going on 8 years I have _never_ hit the limit. Does that mean that it is high enough? For me, yes. For others, I can't say. Footnotes: [1] Not quite true, I knew that there probably was some sort of limit, I just didn't know what it was. -- |---------------------| | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. | | The proof of the pudding, is under the crust. | |---------------------------------| --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Eicq - The XEmacs ICQ Client iEYEABECAAYFAkAHVb8ACgkQHSfbS6lLMAOP9ACfcI5uk9gxCzs/OGuydcdA3DLv qxYAn2vNBmYLYj2Gqw/NbOPEriuqYt/T =kGKL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/