Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 00:20:44 +0530
From:   Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
To:     Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>, joe@perches.com
Cc:     lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, jic23@kernel.org,
        knaack.h@gmx.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-usp@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad5933: add binding doc for ad5933
Message-ID: <20181202185043.GA2007@himanshu-Vostro-3559>
References: <20181202165712.t6pd6ygq57llf2lr@smtp.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181202165712.t6pd6ygq57llf2lr@smtp.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 02:57:12PM -0200, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> Add a devicetree documentation for the ad5933 and ad5934 impedance
> converter, network analyzer.
> 
> Co-Developed-by: Gabriel Capella <gabriel@capella.pro>

checkpatch spits out:

WARNING: Non-standard signature: Co-Developed-by:

Co-developed-by Vs Co-Developed-by ?

Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst: - Co-developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:12) When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-Developed-by:

Confusing! Don't know which one is correct.

> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Capella <gabriel@capella.pro>
> ---

Use `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl <your_patch>` to list the DT
maintainers and the relevant mailing list.


-- 
Himanshu Jha
Undergraduate Student
Department of Electronics & Communication
Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology