Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6363222imu; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 16:26:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WyEjaXO2XE+ZyEvzNQmcHZtdeKEj/vd4ssehS6/BS6oRyY8MW0wKx692AKvkUR70vxIuCU X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e085:: with SMTP id cb5mr13741412plb.24.1543796776996; Sun, 02 Dec 2018 16:26:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543796776; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sZQNpgF8zalYWp6mHyfMdY33abYq3SHf6L0F4kT5DrYQhYel5I534wf7xz0ZD3zSmH jUrlX6yadVd6WKo4nrsk12Ir+u6hBtKdoEszypmsgW8tfNKSpdU0c4SkAOB9Q6fWd9ZI PFVrzoUH9bCMBjAwkFpZGeTmzLB96PgnaJrm1nRVJArUnfpue1LJsOAKb2ugeIq/j8/z h1HQq19WRyQ4blTRmVSR6OfEi9AcqTAB0t3elwhEM9qepYMGpGFoKuYyBmagb5fWp9fd sb1imVBivu3duZP8iME8DbsY3hyVAD7Bg0gLb1XeOKJtjcCeLPbxqVpqGFl/NflVH9SH 82uA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=gG0tykmjq9IBCF71sw/zxmE3GiLuVx+ORdrMdUgVUGo=; b=lhEm8tug3ajSzXcGYv49R5HG2fk2dGjMVcxJdfRTZjF32Juo9CTalK6vkHJZmogApU 21d6ERldcwIaMinLb/rgg2Aa37jmfE7d5kKdES8M0YPnBZsX1PS27KHV01KVb/I9pLaE XLZMPxHtKTDaGvW+uqHrorYgAah3m5lcS0e0njKTFxJXyR62LvSuMj1O1i1eVGTOh+YH VMKSPxWUtsfI7TlYaTic0JXf+IPpeBYwQjNTps7nMCD/7igZ05IwRPwzCgfthZP84zDy 6ok8xzg+nqd4YSU4BZXaXwA4Yc1K+lNFgTQG1cHD+CLPb6792oicpxezcNZ04/XFG/2D gu/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y2si11204494pgl.148.2018.12.02.16.26.02; Sun, 02 Dec 2018 16:26:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725878AbeLCAYn (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 2 Dec 2018 19:24:43 -0500 Received: from vmicros1.altlinux.org ([194.107.17.57]:37770 "EHLO vmicros1.altlinux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725838AbeLCAYn (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Dec 2018 19:24:43 -0500 Received: from mua.local.altlinux.org (mua.local.altlinux.org [192.168.1.14]) by vmicros1.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A88D72CA65; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 03:24:36 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mua.local.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 508) id 8DA3E7CCE9D; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 03:24:36 +0300 (MSK) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 03:24:36 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Elvira Khabirova , linux-m68k , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] m68k: define syscall_get_arch() Message-ID: <20181203002436.GA9487@altlinux.org> References: <20181120001128.GA11300@altlinux.org> <20181120001524.GF11387@altlinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Geert, On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 11:29:10AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Dmitry, >=20 > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:15 AM Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > syscall_get_arch() is required to be implemented on all architectures > > in order to extend the generic ptrace API with PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO > > request. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin >=20 > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven >=20 > What's your plan w.r.t. the upstreaming strategy? > Do you plan to get this series in as a whole, or through individual archi= tecture > maintainers? Given that the last patch in this series adds an argument to syscall_get_arch(), my plan is to get this series in as a whole along with PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO series. --=20 ldv --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJcBHfEAAoJEAVFT+BVnCUIv3IQANEYpjiuqjrx7/vCgL6hw4aU s6HDODsgDAjjBjtPQk6/f/cDxKt8PJixYYdIB/XQFIOopARMwdwMmJ9Qv11WW1Wo FcN2NIC74unafyWdaiss6/M5UAAstuKps7LCWPV6Lnhe7jR7Z8Imkz8ESL0070EH fZcl4lnqrpukaISh4XPu3E5egiSzM0emWc/CwyotRirujLJ3AvCJrGBOyOzLaJBu BuJo1Q3kZkPRsZvXjMn56fcWI2GfN2bjmtxxBLvmkcxFkkeQCQguhbAJ9SxYBHL7 c7W9Ov43TX85IEy6rpsr0ohBQUMyDMPxFp1chSayODDxOh6gnSiy7yLcFjk9ufvi Poh0O5HUQRVlgvUcYD6spQ1xzroganvbmFdP9ypXUGw2myfQIKJ5fzeW0HcN5zgV VtkT2EEV4jEufpz+lSbaeBmhbC4Gk6/AALfyaJQwyey2/8tGJRzRUvonPt+smf6L 9giJpoUP3Uj/VtoNrVbPZ6AFunOYu3/xk7WKc50ZtUjpfxs+G16B3XMw89PYNamu LVcVVDxcqxM+OPkOka0xe8RhgFOwG0DQbBJ7sGU4ePm/aQJ4zXwYUU/qusk6wEOQ 9NsX9KidkeGHiKFkdPxw0Jklh618M5zcww2cTFQnrZWEAgbWuWQDt56LhTc5z5Yq LGGFLKlDR1Eop8GVyRbl =xI3X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--