Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265335AbUAPJ2e (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:28:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265332AbUAPJ2d (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:28:33 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:30408 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265333AbUAPJ23 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:28:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:24:47 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Matt Domsch , Neil Brown Cc: Scott Long , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Proposed enhancements to MD Message-ID: <20040116092447.GF22417@marowsky-bree.de> References: <40033D02.8000207@adaptec.com> <16389.52150.148792.875315@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20040115155221.A31378@lists.us.dell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040115155221.A31378@lists.us.dell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1830 Lines: 55 On 2004-01-15T15:52:21, Matt Domsch said: > * Solution works in both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels > - less ideal of two different solutions are needed Sure, this is important. > * RAID 0,1 DDF format > * Bootable from degraded R1 We were looking at extending the boot loader (grub/lilo) to have additional support for R1 & multipath. (ie, booting from the first drive/path in the set where a consistent image can be read.) If the BIOS supports DDF too, this would get even better. For the boot drive, this is highly desireable! Do you know whether DDF can also support simple multipathing? > * Boot from degraded RAID1 requires setup method early in boot > process, either initrd or kernel code. This is needed with DDF too; we need to parse the DDF data somewhere afterall. > From what I see about md: > * RAID 0,1 there today, no DDF Supporting additional metadata is desireable. For 2.6, this is already in the code, and I am looking forward to having this feature. > Am I way off base here? :-) I don't think so. But for 2.6, the functionality should go either into DM or MD, not into emd. I don't care which, really, both sides have good arguments, none of which _really_ matter from a user-perspective ;-) (If, in 2.7 time, we rip out MD and fully integrate it all into DM, then we can see further.) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter. SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better. Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/