Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 62CD260AD8
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181127101145.7682-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
 <20181127101145.7682-2-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> <154342225921.88331.14467967828250776155@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
 <0d76b669-6c4f-7c3b-50a1-084201f2c07a@arm.com> <CAFp+6iEC8hobAdVF5nLdhQdCUqbi1xa4Vi-NLugGshV=dg+h1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181130181536.GA15274@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181130181536.GA15274@arm.com>
From:   Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:13:38 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iH-T3KsUH8SDoLDfmJ6x_iHxtHGDySuKib0L_u46G6h6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, sboyd@kernel.org,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
        Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>," <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, "robh+dt" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        alex.williamson@redhat.com,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:45 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:25:20PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:07 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 28/11/2018 16:24, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > Quoting Vivek Gautam (2018-11-27 02:11:41)
> > > >> @@ -1966,6 +1970,23 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_smmu_of_match[] = {
> > > >>   };
> > > >>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smmu_of_match);
> > > >>
> > > >> +static void arm_smmu_fill_clk_data(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> > > >> +                                  const char * const *clks)
> > > >> +{
> > > >> +       int i;
> > > >> +
> > > >> +       if (smmu->num_clks < 1)
> > > >> +               return;
> > > >> +
> > > >> +       smmu->clks = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, smmu->num_clks,
> > > >> +                                 sizeof(*smmu->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >> +       if (!smmu->clks)
> > > >> +               return;
> > > >> +
> > > >> +       for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_clks; i++)
> > > >> +               smmu->clks[i].id = clks[i];
> > > >
> > > > Is this clk_bulk_get_all()?
> >
> > From what I remember, and now I could go back to v7 and check [1], we parked
> > clk_bulk_get out of OF's sole purview as we also have
> > arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe() besides arm_smmu_device_dt_probe().
> >
> > arm_smmu_device_dt_probe() could get the clocks from dt and fill in
> > the clock bulk data, and
> > similarly, arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe() could fill the clock bulk data
> > by getting it from ACPI.
> >
> > clk_bulk_get_all() seems like going only the OF way.
> > Is there another way here to have something common between ACPI
> > and OF, and then do the clk_bulk_get?
>
> I'd say just go with clk_bulk_get_all() and if somebody really wants to
> mess with the SMMU clocks on a system booted via ACPI, then it's their
> problem to solve. My understanding is that the design of IORT makes this
> next to impossible to solve anyway, because a static table is used and
> therefore we're unable to run whatever ASL methods need to be invoked to
> mess with the clocks.

Sure then. I will respin this patch-series.

>
> Will


-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation