Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 09:35:00 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn,
        mingo@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locktorture: Fix assignment of boolean variables
Message-ID: <20181203083500.GH11614@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20181201083149.36972-1-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
 <20181201203700.GW4170@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181201203700.GW4170@linux.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 12:37:01PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 04:31:49PM +0800, Wen Yang wrote:
> > Fix the following warnings reported by coccinelle:
> > 
> > kernel/locking/locktorture.c:703:6-10: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
> > kernel/locking/locktorture.c:918:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
> > kernel/locking/locktorture.c:949:3-20: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
> > kernel/locking/locktorture.c:682:2-19: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
> > kernel/locking/locktorture.c:688:2-19: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
> > kernel/locking/locktorture.c:648:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
> > kernel/locking/locktorture.c:654:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
> > 
> > This patch also makes the code more readable.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
> > CC: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> > CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> > CC: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Adding the current maintainers on CC.

So I strongly disagree with this. Anybody that has trouble with 0/1 vs
false/true needs to stay the heck away from C.

I would suggest we delete that stupid coccinelle scripts that generates
these pointless warns.