Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6738255imu; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 01:51:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VGFfTmtGV1BwEO+CAknrdKiH+LVwiLijNCuYWgr+63j9wM7ZFczk1oxcYwBsRmJNiSaRAE X-Received: by 2002:a63:334a:: with SMTP id z71mr12803875pgz.400.1543830713363; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 01:51:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543830713; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gfWxg5NQfGevh8hX7aLM8uoPY1oQmN51cpdewLs4tBEIdsj8iE98KlUYY1hfMuevEm gOQGwaqZTtWpOfp52P+2bk/tmat4lPMYx+6X6FvXd52N78a+rqAeAv/6CN3p2TyOVgA0 VQF8Fy/ua96Asw1wPDSu+XKJHwUHYWXGveelwnABg60vSyJCrq1V+QNQUJLEgGy1l7ua N111kqDURHY+Coee4SwH6jMQqAdtLBqxwK3tkFcFQIgIIRhbKQ9CpM7iRrGvpKvPdKmP B4boBYrAugKDJ8unkh1k9qoDzUg/9N7WZ8nVw76b7ne4WwKOM1Y4bNXz8xSLVcvs2vVB /v4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ZKWBfNr1d6jiC9PUJ3ojTn4JsgNHqrrVM9auFLqGQEg=; b=hjz1R6kotOrs+hN20yCOANQxJkkWeO3weUXNkvKD7b5iRjY+VMBIyqkhp767OcbfZg XquovvGSvLsb/dOf9LvSU6+wPwOszkMP304h7XQxDJongLkDPoVsS1FhMWM8paBNMpT8 eHy8thl9bKIv8YfJVNZ3fzvSYWFMBMydr4fQApEIzVL4j73eS2mVcLdDU1xJE5f18zpB vhJWllQsrSPBte4xrnSrC9G4jhiWqoAH07RSUlWscNkH9jATHKqNER1UAFzGP+sasV6e zS9Xjt53DOBtXNmMCg7jWeLTj2c6CH2zRR3tezJNbIJGOGrOla24Mvli0No+7mtR6Mjl AlsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si14767812plb.103.2018.12.03.01.51.38; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 01:51:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726126AbeLCJth (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 04:49:37 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([85.220.165.71]:51035 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725888AbeLCJtg (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 04:49:36 -0500 Received: from ptx.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gTkqk-0007kI-En; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 10:49:10 +0100 Received: from ukl by ptx.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gTkqi-0000Mw-3M; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 10:49:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:49:08 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Hao Zhang Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, maxime.ripard@bootlin.com, wens@csie.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: PWM: add allwinner sun8i R40/T3/V40 PWM support. Message-ID: <20181203094908.lga2r56gelaghrej@pengutronix.de> References: <20181125162319.GA5422@arx-s1> <20181126213158.q5m5bbwnmewud2gb@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20181126213158.q5m5bbwnmewud2gb@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > +static int sun8i_pwm_config(struct sun8i_pwm_chip *sun8i_pwm, u8 ch, > > + struct pwm_state *state) > > +{ > > +[...] > > + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(clk); > > + val = state->period * clk_rate; > > + do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC); > > + if (val <= 1) { > > + dev_err(sun8i_pwm->chip.dev, > > + "Period expects a larger value\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + /* change clock source to "mux-1" */ > > + clk_disable_unprepare(sun8i_pwm->clk); > > + devm_clk_put(sun8i_pwm->chip.dev, sun8i_pwm->clk); > > + sun8i_pwm->clk = clk; > > sun8i_pwm is shared for all 8 PWMs, right? So if you assign mux-1 here > for the second mux, how does this influence the first PWM? To clearify my question: after the first pwm is used and enabled (maybe using mux-0) changing sun8i_pwm->clk for the second pwm is broken because then when the first pwm is disabled the wrong clock is stopped. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |