Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6759505imu; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 02:16:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UWTcQ8BF+bxcsuBu7tta9FqXzmERVT2vCzz11PSgsEin+VbTYszglBHCjBUh5hO/Uba1LB X-Received: by 2002:a63:cc4e:: with SMTP id q14mr6516240pgi.291.1543832172188; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:16:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543832172; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dcFfJBGA8iT9B3iLD4UYsiELyWUBplBFxDvliSxSgUuhYxLNvIECKklbg5JAq5Laln vVKXcZwvQ9zNU19heNBT2ydW/oi5XTmOtUYkg76mjyb6Qse5GuzZ04Q0gQGZUF8JjFgz 8pAsTM5yF0vFeRb+xao75fb4l79MI8JaTzHfXRctQcN80RNkTVyvRzVgspMdTkQzLvqH I+8Nwq6EnC1AGNXyj0unc4BooCQoHS5E52bHltnd0RadypKo6+d2m4jIZatUFjbOXmIQ uQMUVRfjKToMuxHbrJSEQ/h7xTngjWXS0V2KtQKbLQ/e7yJTqRaRKuCg/ODP0xMmXXo5 DRNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=EDUUEAg20NJf+58GWdboQc/roPg78okXlZqlGkEexB8=; b=NG7l8fpkaTufmz/i0DXWjg3IcwhoQjjQdx9X8/0cFYJHHi2mNA2BR6Y6sZTsbHEst0 no4NPEYKgcIflsNFGDw8b8uj4lA1L2pxiRXS1sxvKl9eViJjgJ4UTUyZ1kDg/k4D90hI AhPQn8Z/fCXmISECridNOxd4xP0iKu8BiddauxNsNlYwewiYKWWq++tdmQEogCf3LnFv PHTNoanR42XgpiIjKJW3AN3QesaoguXOJQpzoxXVRJh672VAFLpHj96ePrPky3L6HoGw a5bt7E/egsxQe5WIiS/5zmmnmx3+AlpZibjFkU/7z8XmdNiWfwXTIzh+jpwTBHIcS26s 964g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f11si13838956plr.341.2018.12.03.02.15.56; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 02:16:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726171AbeLCKPe (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 05:15:34 -0500 Received: from orbyte.nwl.cc ([151.80.46.58]:55484 "EHLO orbyte.nwl.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725888AbeLCKPe (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 05:15:34 -0500 Received: from n0-1 by orbyte.nwl.cc with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gTlFq-0002xa-3I; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:15:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:15:06 +0100 From: Phil Sutter To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Willem de Bruijn , Daniel Axtens , Toshiaki Makita , Stefano Brivio , Yonghong Song , Paolo Abeni , "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 15/15] net: replace **** with a hug Message-ID: <20181203101506.GM30790@orbyte.nwl.cc> Mail-Followup-To: Phil Sutter , Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Willem de Bruijn , Daniel Axtens , Toshiaki Makita , Stefano Brivio , Yonghong Song , Paolo Abeni , "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" References: <20181130192737.15053-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181130192737.15053-16-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181130192737.15053-16-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27:24AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug. This is incorrect: The patch doesn't replace '****', but 'fuck' instead. > - /* Fuck, we are miserable poor guys... */ > + /* Hug, we are miserable poor guys... */ I fail to see the benefit from doing that. If I wrote: "Hug you you hugging hug", you would still find it offensive as long as you know what "hug" is supposed to translate into. And if you don't, you'll soon find out. A more constructive approach to replacing "fuck this and that" than simply applying 's/fuck/whatever/' would be to provide details what exactly is so bad about this and that. Of course that's not possible without considerable effort, unlike your approach which doesn't alter what is written but merely which words are used for it. Cheers, Phil