Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:53:55 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: add probe_user_read() and probe_user_address()
References: <dd9ef91add7fcf5a9e369dde322b1822e90eb218.1543811917.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dd9ef91add7fcf5a9e369dde322b1822e90eb218.1543811917.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Message-Id: <20181203175354.GE26700@rapoport-lnx>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:06:42PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> In the powerpc, there are several places implementing safe
> access to user data. This is sometimes implemented using
> probe_kernel_address() with additional access_ok() verification,
> sometimes with get_user() enclosed in a pagefault_disable()/enable()
> pair, etc... :
>     show_user_instructions()
>     bad_stack_expansion()
>     p9_hmi_special_emu()
>     fsl_pci_mcheck_exception()
>     read_user_stack_64()
>     read_user_stack_32() on PPC64
>     read_user_stack_32() on PPC32
>     power_pmu_bhrb_to()
> 
> In the same spirit as probe_kernel_read() and probe_kernel_address(),
> this patch adds probe_user_read() and probe_user_address().
> 
> probe_user_read() does the same as probe_kernel_read() but
> first checks that it is really a user address.
> 
> probe_user_address() is a shortcut to probe_user_read()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> ---
>  Changes since RFC: Made a static inline function instead of weak function as recommended by Kees.
> 
>  include/linux/uaccess.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> index efe79c1cdd47..83ea8aefca75 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> @@ -266,6 +266,48 @@ extern long strncpy_from_unsafe(char *dst, const void *unsafe_addr, long count);
>  #define probe_kernel_address(addr, retval)		\
>  	probe_kernel_read(&retval, addr, sizeof(retval))
> 
> +/**
> + * probe_user_read(): safely attempt to read from a user location
> + * @dst: pointer to the buffer that shall take the data
> + * @src: address to read from
> + * @size: size of the data chunk
> + *
> + * Safely read from address @src to the buffer at @dst.  If a kernel fault
> + * happens, handle that and return -EFAULT.
> + *
> + * We ensure that the copy_from_user is executed in atomic context so that
> + * do_page_fault() doesn't attempt to take mmap_sem.  This makes
> + * probe_user_read() suitable for use within regions where the caller
> + * already holds mmap_sem, or other locks which nest inside mmap_sem.

Please add 'Returns:' description.

> + */
> +
> +#ifndef probe_user_read
> +static __always_inline long probe_user_read(void *dst, const void __user *src,
> +					    size_t size)
> +{
> +	long ret;
> +
> +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, src, size))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	pagefault_disable();
> +	ret = __copy_from_user_inatomic(dst, src, size);
> +	pagefault_enable();
> +
> +	return ret ? -EFAULT : 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +/**
> + * probe_user_address(): safely attempt to read from a user location
> + * @addr: address to read from
> + * @retval: read into this variable
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, or -EFAULT.

This should be 'Return:' for kernel-doc to recognise it as return value
description.

> + */
> +#define probe_user_address(addr, retval)		\
> +	probe_user_read(&(retval), addr, sizeof(retval))
> +
>  #ifndef user_access_begin
>  #define user_access_begin() do { } while (0)
>  #define user_access_end() do { } while (0)
> -- 
> 2.13.3
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.