Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp7371781imu; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:48:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XieUjnAE5lSfxKQr9efkZFdOqKTTVmLo5xz4wlzyEYgpN4FoWoI/b09T1UiFNGjWmFALAS X-Received: by 2002:a63:4187:: with SMTP id o129mr13259207pga.370.1543866520255; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:48:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543866520; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j8G6CfUq7r+RvcvJd7LTANrYY+68atvPvp2hwu9iWztyTXyegewsIhUQPa/iwnf/0k a/T7Dn8ULkoM2RTiM7na6uWyiPRXEhGr/xM7mC+okXE++YmDEZJOFDmJkzLaSaJgP8zD a20BueWs7YClJuAWfQXMVjlmQAVU3vSEt/3pgGuGTZNdKtv2v8QG67tVmNCbmQbY/WpH abJhVm8IcaZbX/t7oXM9m68cLMJPesYTeDopkNvLbUU0R2ZTK/r3DN0pk7BW1KC4CRcO 8M2PqO29ktmi7IW2Gt2d99jqMpb1wbpjd3t72wasvvtJkFptRgJawUhyect+xeXowtM4 pQgA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=WvsfG1Hf59BZmWS8TB3JDmf5aMyusWt2oHRpSFGjJ3E=; b=NH7ZrteB7wERg4lzk00CJEog4UjXrssbITsZR612I/vbzAqZ6VfJurMXX8nmPJG1Tl bqRaRwTvx4F6Suy/9ICBni73pbtXuDoV3mwz8QXK/LC5KThPvBRpPzruD0zv29RCZ49N Ukzgk910URSlMkSG8woA+cJGgF7zvTKCbymDU7p7pkVFRAmqITG2VoikGMot8BOm1u12 NTwxmg4j3hN+WUE9yo+P7ytPVf+2OH7cuJAkEB/wlvLlmJGXg+KEeKSj1SibKkz4Fg78 0xbFB5I+8A/g0DUEjcUsN8OVq2EaJ/WoHA4X3UjfiVhhXTQ99P4GAyV49uays516hNhk lzsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=gtjxwFcU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f127si7731190pfc.69.2018.12.03.11.48.25; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:48:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=gtjxwFcU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725936AbeLCTrx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:47:53 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]:45506 "EHLO mail-ot1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725885AbeLCTrw (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:47:52 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id 32so12785410ota.12 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:47:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WvsfG1Hf59BZmWS8TB3JDmf5aMyusWt2oHRpSFGjJ3E=; b=gtjxwFcUFT6V0ldNYyuoz4aNiqOB/417idYjiuI3pfKHWn0ZmVO/azEaeCjlwCNtAG paX7HVndWLmoTcnAoidViBq2ih79Tm/F8UAC3ux2rowNcMC47KsHfEPI2i5y1biqa9hK g9OZ0WERJYEey5mtntPA4I8yTTBbPU7CWBSwoMmo4ndJ3MeKv5IJNrAkA7V6W2JY+yf1 CU3qCdXBDKoNJ2RFapZTO1JqSDqfmH243E/imN4chyZW8sV2gXnbNXA/xHrW+qbiD7Pr MzGo9xeQAUuZgFpvuy9csZtBctgQ+wvKP9vgBfbfBN0sjWZxlurvv9/OS6kBlGFfpcLS SnRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WvsfG1Hf59BZmWS8TB3JDmf5aMyusWt2oHRpSFGjJ3E=; b=L7v4U6W7hlmmUVB1H2v73O7h9KbxSTt83HCGBTKV2AlzA1p0lYoBV/fN8o+ukKPQLV qjjbxffAl3eDXmhVAzGvZsCP61kxN4t/ThmdiI8nGp2vEoEXG3Ex8245iRsvOMjRmLPV AklIsFA+SpmVPUc6e9b+fhH7OoXXtZEolFVrNO6xKawSsINPDWYAfz+uLld464b1ID8R a/R8kUYnUnPkQ1+VbaEZthLQHpmkqr9USG/eaJzMHMKUxy+fUBePOsNfENt9ZULX1ZSp x9TgV1aYtGE1TJr9U+y8MRMcPA+h0+uDsIZfc36pSYfGWH4mSVTqZw0ZwBtCR3nZd/1M 8YXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWag8ErKCK8U6G8Kp+OuLhSg2+zwfdPMwwsimKQLMXpGtGdA4f5d qJ64MJ3iiQ0l1v01ZWDwEPVNcU4hZtBrYQwGBmLm0A== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7dd5:: with SMTP id k21mr11471267otn.214.1543866469698; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:47:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <154386493754.27193.1300965403157243427.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> <154386513120.27193.7977541941078967487.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <154386513120.27193.7977541941078967487.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:47:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mm: Add support for exposing if dev_pagemap supports refcount pinning To: alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Zhang Yi , Barret Rhoden , KVM list , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux MM , Dave Jiang , "Zhang, Yu C" , Pankaj Gupta , David Hildenbrand , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , rkrcmar@redhat.com, =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:25 AM Alexander Duyck wrote: > > Add a means of exposing if a pagemap supports refcount pinning. I am doing > this to expose if a given pagemap has backing struct pages that will allow > for the reference count of the page to be incremented to lock the page > into place. > > The KVM code already has several spots where it was trying to use a > pfn_valid check combined with a PageReserved check to determien if it could > take a reference on the page. I am adding this check so in the case of the > page having the reserved flag checked we can check the pagemap for the page > to determine if we might fall into the special DAX case. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck > --- > drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 2 ++ > include/linux/memremap.h | 5 ++++- > include/linux/mm.h | 11 +++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c > index 6f22272e8d80..7a4a85bcf7f4 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c > @@ -640,6 +640,8 @@ static int __nvdimm_setup_pfn(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap) > } else > return -ENXIO; > > + pgmap->support_refcount_pinning = true; > + There should be no dev_pagemap instance instance where this isn't true, so I'm missing why this is needed?