Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181128193636.254378-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>
 <20181128193636.254378-15-brendanhiggins@google.com> <b4c72234-8c56-6efa-8003-f89d99a9779e@ideasonboard.com>
 <20181130034525.GP18410@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181130034525.GP18410@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com>
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 15:53:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFd5g47Cew6pmebsopjzmkd4RpnnC3zLAUfxCybjdhrO35OBpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 14/19] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit
To:     mcgrof@kernel.org
Cc:     kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>, shuah@kernel.org,
        Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
        joe@perches.com, brakmo@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        Tim.Bird@sony.com, khilman@baylibre.com,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
        Felix Guo <felixguoxiuping@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:45 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:56:37PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > Hi Brendan,
> >
> > Please excuse the top posting, but I'm replying here as I'm following
> > the section "Creating a kunitconfig" in Documentation/kunit/start.rst.
> >
> > Could the three line kunitconfig file live under say
> >        arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig?
> >
> > So that it's always provided? And could even be extended with tests
> > which people would expect to be run by default? (say in distributions)
>
> Indeed, and then a top level 'make kunitconfig' could use it as well.

Yep, I totally agree.