Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181128193636.254378-1-brendanhiggins@google.com>
 <20181128193636.254378-17-brendanhiggins@google.com> <CAL_JsqK5cG=QzMBFSZ31_-3ujnxqxv=jj3XYajbRLT7yWYZbfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK5cG=QzMBFSZ31_-3ujnxqxv=jj3XYajbRLT7yWYZbfw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:00:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFd5g44vWXpY_N80UcAKVkgYQkBLP0qOV1=kwPyxcH4umOf8dg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 16/19] arch: um: make UML unflatten device tree when testing
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>, mcgrof@kernel.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
        mpe@ellerman.id.au, joe@perches.com, brakmo@fb.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, Tim.Bird@sony.com, khilman@baylibre.com,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:16 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:38 PM Brendan Higgins
> <brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c b/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c
> > index a818ccef30ca2..bd58ae3bf4148 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c
> > +++ b/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST)
> > +       unflatten_device_tree();
> > +#endif
>
> Kind of strange to have this in the arch code. I'd rather have this in
> the unittest code if possible. Can we have an initcall conditional on
> CONFIG_UM in the unittest do this? Side note, use a C if with
> IS_ENABLED() whenever possible instead of pre-processor #if.

Yeah, that makes more sense. I will send a separate patch.

>
> I'll take a fix separately as it was on my todo to fix. I've got the
> unit tests running in a gitlab CI job now[1].
>
> Rob
>
> [1] https://gitlab.com/robherring/linux-dt-unittest/pipelines