Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:17:26 -0700
From:   Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@01.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
        Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
        Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] seccomp: switch system call argument type to void
 *
Message-ID: <20181204021726.GG3504@cisco>
References: <20181203032827.27978-3-tycho@tycho.ws>
 <201812041031.7kJxvTuh%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201812041031.7kJxvTuh%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:07:38AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Tycho,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.20-rc5 next-20181203]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Tycho-Andersen/seccomp-hoist-struct-seccomp_data-recalculation-higher/20181204-013450
> config: i386-randconfig-x005-201848 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=i386 
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from kernel/seccomp.c:28:0:
> >> include/linux/syscalls.h:239:18: error: conflicting types for 'sys_seccomp'
>      asmlinkage long sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__)) \
>                      ^
>    include/linux/syscalls.h:225:2: note: in expansion of macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
>      __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    include/linux/syscalls.h:216:36: note: in expansion of macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
>     #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
>                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    kernel/seccomp.c:946:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
>     SYSCALL_DEFINE3(seccomp, unsigned int, op, unsigned int, flags,
>     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    In file included from kernel/seccomp.c:28:0:
>    include/linux/syscalls.h:881:17: note: previous declaration of 'sys_seccomp' was here
>     asmlinkage long sys_seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags,
>                     ^~~~~~~~~~~

Huh, I have no idea why I don't see this, but even with the attached
config it still doesn't cause a problem for me. Anyway, I'll fix it up
and do some more investigating...

Tycho