Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:55:04 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Patrick Mau <mau@oscar.ping.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Stale Filehandles was: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2
Message-ID: <20040116185504.GN1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Patrick Mau <mau@oscar.ping.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
References: <20040116050642.GF1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> <20040116130336.GA5220@oscar.prima.de> <20040116184031.GM1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040116184031.GM1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1000
Lines: 20

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:40:31AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I only had a few nfs clients doing light load, (kde home directories, and
> such) and was able to reproduce stale nfs file handles just by running "find
> > /dev/null" on the nfs share.
> 
> Have you tried the -mm tree recently?  2.6.1-mm4 even has some new nfsd
> patches in there (maybe you should wait until -mm5 though, there are a few

Stale filehandles is the main problem right now, and I don't see how
nfs_raname would be related (just that it was there while I was having
trouble with the stale file handles...)

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.1/2.6.1-mm4/broken-out/nfsd-01-stale-filehandles-fixes.patch

This one looks particularly interesting...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/