Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265914AbUAPUQh (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:16:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265916AbUAPUQh (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:16:37 -0500 Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.52]:54189 "EHLO mtaw4.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265914AbUAPUQe (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:16:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:16:23 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Patrick Mau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Stale Filehandles was: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2 Message-ID: <20040116201623.GO1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Patrick Mau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com References: <20040116050642.GF1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> <20040116130336.GA5220@oscar.prima.de> <20040116184031.GM1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> <20040116185504.GN1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040116185504.GN1748@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1602 Lines: 40 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:55:04AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:40:31AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > I only had a few nfs clients doing light load, (kde home directories, and > > such) and was able to reproduce stale nfs file handles just by running "find > > > /dev/null" on the nfs share. > > > > Have you tried the -mm tree recently? 2.6.1-mm4 even has some new nfsd > > patches in there (maybe you should wait until -mm5 though, there are a few > > Stale filehandles is the main problem right now, and I don't see how > nfs_raname would be related (just that it was there while I was having > trouble with the stale file handles...) > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.1/2.6.1-mm4/broken-out/nfsd-01-stale-filehandles-fixes.patch > > This one looks particularly interesting... > Most of the nfs client patches are for NFS4 or RPCSEC_GSS. Except for: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.1/2.6.1-mm4/broken-out/ nfs-26-sock_disconnect.patch nfs-31-attr.patch nfs-client-deadlock-fix.patch nfs-fix-bogus-setattr-calls.patch nfs-open-intent-fix.patch nfs-optimise-COMMIT-calls.patch nfs-readonly-mounts-fix.patch nfs-rpc-debug-oops-fix.patch These might be interesting to test, but so far I haven't had troubles with the stock Linus 2.6 nfs3 client. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/