Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265984AbUAQCPp (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:15:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265988AbUAQCPp (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:15:45 -0500 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:22252 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265984AbUAQCPl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:15:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 03:15:32 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: "Richard B. Johnson" , robert@schwebel.de Cc: cliff white , piggin@cyberone.com.au, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [1/4] better i386 CPU selection Message-ID: <20040117021532.GH12027@fs.tum.de> References: <20040106054859.GA18208@waste.org> <3FFA56D6.6040808@cyberone.com.au> <20040106064607.GB18208@waste.org> <3FFA5ED3.6040000@cyberone.com.au> <20040110004625.GB25089@fs.tum.de> <20040110005232.GD25089@fs.tum.de> <20040116111501.70200cf3.cliffw@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1714 Lines: 52 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:32:39PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, cliff white wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:52:32 +0100 > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > > Changes: > > > > - AMD Elan is a different subarch, you can't configure a kernel that > > > runs on both the AMD Elan and other i386 CPUs > > NO! NO! This prevents development of an AMD embeded system on an > "ordinary" machine like this one (Pentium IV). The fact that the > timer runs at a different speed means nothing, one just sets the > workstation time every day. Please do NOT do this. It prevents > important usage. What problems exacly are you referring to? Besides the AMD Elan cpufreq driver I see nothing where CONFIG_MELAN gave you any real difference (except your highest goal is to avoid a recompilation when switching from the Pentium 4 to the AMD Elan - but I doubt the really "prevents development"). But I'm not religious about this issue. Let Robert decide, the Elan support is his child. > > > - added optimizing CFLAGS for the AMD Elan > > There are no such different "optimizations" for ELAN. What's wrong wih the -march=i486 Robert suggested? > Cheers, > Dick Johnson cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/