Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265987AbUAQEWN (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:22:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265992AbUAQEWN (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:22:13 -0500 Received: from krusty.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:19625 "EHLO mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265987AbUAQEWL (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:22:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:22:08 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.1 and cdrecord on ATAPI bus Message-ID: <20040117042208.GA8664@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel References: <20040117031925.GA26477@widomaker.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040117031925.GA26477@widomaker.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 931 Lines: 25 On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: > I'm now running kernel 2.6.1, and using cdrecord with ATAPI is > problematic. I don't find it is. It's rather cdrecord insisting on scanning buses itself and bitching about direct device names... > First problem is that cdrecord now must reload media often, runs slowly, > and burns slowly. Reading CD/RW disks burned under 2.6.x is much slower > than those burned under kernel 2.4 (same version of cdrecord in all > cases). Interesting. I use dev=/dev/hdc and it works fine for me (Plextor 48X), but then again, I'm also running the latest cdrecord alpha. -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/